Re: Forum requirements and (un)desirables Reply #25 – 2013-12-20, 16:13:50 Quote from: Josh on 2013-12-19, 18:01:37It seems to me that I can't.Now I see I can!:)Frans, what about a shortcut for quoting?
Re: Forum requirements and (un)desirables Reply #26 – 2013-12-20, 18:07:52 Quote from: Josh on 2013-12-20, 16:13:50Frans, what about a shortcut for quoting?Huh?
Re: Forum requirements and (un)desirables Reply #27 – 2013-12-20, 18:13:22 Well, I'm highlighting some text, then I need to scroll the page to reach the 'quote' button, right?
Re: Forum requirements and (un)desirables Reply #28 – 2013-12-20, 18:26:25 If you're quoting from a really long post, I suppose. I'll consider making something pop up in an unobtrusive place if/when I write my own quick quote, but I'm not sure how feasible that is precisely. A better idea might be to expose a Javascript function which could be activated through a bookmarklet.
Re: Forum requirements and (un)desirables Reply #29 – 2013-12-20, 18:44:38 Also I'd like to see the string who's online not only at the Index page. It seems redundant on topic pages, but on most others... I mean on such special pages as "new posts" and such.And what about adding more "post moods"? A "Shocked" would be amazing!:D
Re: Forum requirements and (un)desirables Reply #31 – 2013-12-24, 07:10:23 Quote from: SmileyFaze on 2013-12-19, 07:05:51In MyOpera when we opened a new thread, that original post was visually distinctive, & easy to spot. It also set in motion what would be in context for posters to easily follow as a basis for discussion. Also, regardless of how many pages the thread had traversed, each page started with the original thread opening/starting post....as a guiding light so to speak ...... a place to remind us of the thread's intended focus.In my travels to many other forums, this feature always set the MyOpera Forums apart from the rest as a positive & motivating factor. That feature you can thank/blame me. One of the forums I was active in (CNET Builder, I believe) at the time the forums were redesigned had this feature, and I really liked it for all the reasons you stated. I still really like it, so +1 from me. It requires that the first post is visually distinct from the other posts, otherwise it can be confusing.
Re: Forum requirements and (un)desirables Reply #32 – 2013-12-24, 07:20:26 Quote from: j7n on 2013-12-19, 14:08:01The post sometimes appeared alone on the last page.The forums have a few page counting bugs, and there are a number of paging-related issues in every forum. Speaking of which, paging in this forum is a blast from forum software past. Particularly the "« previous" and "next »" buttons that don't go to previous/next page, but to previous/next thread, a pretty useless (and confusing) function.
Re: Forum requirements and (un)desirables Reply #33 – 2013-12-24, 09:27:06 Quote from: jax on 2013-12-24, 07:20:26Speaking of which, paging in this forum is a blast from forum software past. Particularly the "« previous" and "next »" buttons that don't go to previous/next page, but to previous/next thread, a pretty useless (and confusing) function.I'll remove those and I'll look into adding first post on every page.
Re: Forum requirements and (un)desirables Reply #34 – 2013-12-24, 09:30:04 ׂ Last Edit: 2014-04-24, 05:22:43 by j7n
Re: Forum requirements and (un)desirables Reply #35 – 2013-12-24, 11:52:06 The page number code is more integrated in the core of the forum and less available in the theme than I'd like. I wrote a quick JS that provides the prev/next functionality for now instead. By quick I also mean it won't work in Opera <10 because that would complicate matters.
Re: Forum requirements and (un)desirables Reply #36 – 2013-12-24, 13:47:20 Quote from: jax on 2013-12-24, 07:10:23That feature you can thank/blame me. One of the forums I was active in (CNET Builder, I believe) at the time the forums were redesigned had this feature, and I really liked it for all the reasons you stated. I still really like it, so +1 from me. It requires that the first post is visually distinct from the other posts, otherwise it can be confusing.An initial implementation is available as an option in Look and Layout.
Re: Forum requirements and (un)desirables Reply #37 – 2013-12-25, 05:31:52 Quote from: Frenzie on 2013-12-24, 11:52:06I wrote a quick JS that provides the prev/next functionality for now instead.Would you add a space between the "Previous" and the next number?(Still desiring a 'quote shortcut'...)
Re: Forum requirements and (un)desirables Reply #38 – 2013-12-25, 23:08:41 Quote from: SmileyFaze on 2013-12-19, 07:05:51In MyOpera when we opened a new thread, that original post was visually distinctive, & easy to spot. It also set in motion what would be in context for posters to easily follow as a basis for discussion.Also, regardless of how many pages the thread had traversed, each page started with the original thread opening/starting post....as a guiding light so to speak ...... a place to remind us of the thread's intended focus.Quote from: Frenzie on 2013-12-24, 13:47:20An initial implementation is available as an option in Look and Layout.Can't argue with perfection --[glow=green,2,300] Well Done!![/glow] ........... The Previous & Next works like a charm too! [move] [/move]
Re: Forum requirements and (un)desirables Reply #39 – 2013-12-27, 07:13:20 I desire that Jimbro shall recover his account.
Re: Forum requirements and (un)desirables Reply #40 – 2013-12-30, 12:04:24 I'd also likethat the numbered list had an option to look like "1)", andthat among the editing tools we had a modest list of the most used/required punctuation (or(and) some other) symbols (Unicode?).[/list]
Re: Forum requirements and (un)desirables Reply #41 – 2013-12-30, 12:07:34 (I see the list paraphernalia need some test driving, er?)
Re: Forum requirements and (un)desirables Reply #42 – 2013-12-30, 12:21:36 Quote from: Josh on 2013-12-30, 12:04:24 that the numbered list had an option to look like "1)",That's not part of the system: http://wiki.simplemachines.org/smf/ListWhat's wrong with this?1) blabla2) blablaIf you want the specific list display, use type=none1) bla2) blaQuote from: Josh on 2013-12-30, 12:04:24 that among the editing tools we had a modest list of the most used/required punctuation (or(and) some other) symbols (Unicode?)I don't really understand the punctuation part of the question, but what kind of symbols are you talking about?
Re: Forum requirements and (un)desirables Reply #43 – 2013-12-30, 12:33:25 Quote from: Frenzie on 2013-12-30, 12:21:36If you want the specific list display, use type=noneO'k.Quote from: Frenzie on 2013-12-30, 12:21:36I don't really understand the punctuation part of the question, but what kind of symbols are you talking about?Some most (needed)common ones from here. And what there about a quoting shortcut? I desire it much...
Re: Forum requirements and (un)desirables Reply #44 – 2013-12-30, 12:38:56 Quote from: Josh on 2013-12-20, 18:44:38And what about adding more "post moods"?Is it difficult?Sometimes I have a mood when replying. And a could also be loved by some
Re: Forum requirements and (un)desirables Reply #45 – 2013-12-30, 13:10:59 Why not use a bookmarklet like this? http://panmental.de/symbols/info.htmQuote from: Josh on 2013-12-30, 12:33:25And what there about a quoting shortcut? I desire it much...Once quick quote is in place I can look into it.
Re: Forum requirements and (un)desirables Reply #46 – 2013-12-31, 10:11:53 Quote from: Frenzie on 2013-12-30, 13:10:59Why not use a bookmarklet like this? http://panmental.de/symbols/info.htmThe mathematical symbols in the toolbox are ok, in other tables the most ones look like sort of poops for me. In the main frame (text) most look like squares.
Re: Forum requirements and (un)desirables Reply #47 – 2013-12-31, 10:14:06 Quote from: Frenzie on 2013-12-30, 13:10:59Once quick quote is in place I can look into it.Are you going to dump your "experimental"?I'd be obliged. (When you look into that;)
Re: Forum requirements and (un)desirables Reply #48 – 2013-12-31, 10:17:03 As of the "moods", it'd be nice to have some , "scared", and .
Re: Forum requirements and (un)desirables Reply #49 – 2013-12-31, 11:09:58 Quote from: Josh on 2013-12-31, 10:14:06Are you going to dump your "experimental"?No… in several use cases the My Opera Enhancements quick quote already significantly outperforms the other one without any effort on my end whatsoever. A few minor adjustments and it'll run many circles around it.
Topic: Forum requirements and (un)desirables (Read 51059 times)
