Re: Is there a Black psychology problem…?
Reply #23 –
[glow=blue,2,300]After all the facts of the Grand Jury's findings were published for public consumption,
here's how the people responded in a poll. [/glow]
Why is there such a divide of perception in this obviously justified * shooting?
* = "Use of deadly force" is often granted to police officers when the person or persons in question are believed to be an immediate danger to people around them. For example, an armed man flaunting a firearm in a shopping mall without regard to the safety of those around him, and refusing or being unwilling to negotiate, would warrant usage of deadly force, as a means to protect others.
The use of deadly force is also authorized when a person poses a significant threat to a law enforcement officer, usually when the officer is at risk of serious bodily injury or death.
In the United States, this is governed by Tennessee v. Garner, (U.S. Supreme Court 1985) which said that "deadly force...may not be used unless necessary to prevent the escape and the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious bodily harm to the officer or others."
The officer has the right & obligation to protect his own life & well-being while carrying out his duty.
This extremely aggressive & mountainous thug tried to forcefully take the officer's firearm once before, & it's quite reasonable to believe he felt that given the chance this man would do so again, & then use that firearm on the officer to kill him if he could.
How stark is that? 
IMHO it couldn't be any clearer ........
Justified use of Deadly Force in Self-Defense ........ pure & simple.