Re: Nonsense from the West over Ukraine
Reply #100 –
"- Trump spoke to Putin first"
Is not Putin the most belligerent party? (Ask a cop or a bar bouncer who you talk to first, when you intend to stop a fight...)
"- Trump called Zelensky the dictator and blamed him for starting the war"
He did; this is another example of Trump's "mean tweet"... So?
"- Trump blames Zelensky for failing to make peace, even though we already have a serial trail of broken peace deals, ceasefires, and negotiation attempts"
Cool! So there can be no peace brokered by Trump, because others have failed... Gotcha! Turn it over to whoever would do a better job. (?)
"- Trump did NOT call Putin the dictator and also not the invader"
So: He refrained from "mean tweets" about the main party he intends to mediate between.... (Make up your mind -or don't- about "mean tweets. Again, you think this about PR, like Zelensky does.)
"- Trump's biggest gripe with Zelensky seems to be that Zelensky is calling Russia the invader and is "saying bad things about Putin""
Nope! Its that -at this point and for the forseeable future- Presiden Putin and President Zelensky are the two who will need to negotiate... (Imagine their first meeting beginning with Z.'s "Hello, you evil murdering two-faced son of a bitch! Let's negotiate..." How do you think that would continue?)
"- The mineral deal, in purely formal terms, is not a peace deal. If we are to relate it to the war at all, it is a war reparations deal (war reparations to be extracted from the victim!), particularly in the shape that Trump is pushing it, namely zero security guarantees, and as such, its terms are clearly straight from Putin"
No shit. But you and, apparently Zelensky, believe "pigs can fly"! That you get to a peace deal without beginning a negotiation...
————————————————————————————
ersi: "Edit: But even this is too diplomatic. At this stage your explicitly stated view is that Ukraine is next to a belligerent neighbour, therefore whatever Trump does is not Trump's fault"
As always, your primitive logic leads you astray... BTW: Did you ;notice Trump paused military aid to Ukraine!?! 
", even when the things he does is getting the aggressor and victim mixed up"
(i.e., "mean tweets"... What would Trump's advantage be, if he made sure Putin wouldn't talk to him? (And where would that leave Zelensky and Ukraine?)
"and negotiating on behalf of the aggressor on aggressor's terms."
If you so strongly believe Trump is trying to negotiate on Putin's behalf, advise Zelensky to reject Trump's efforts outright — he should shop elsewhere for envoys and emissaries!
"Trump is, along with Putin, a colonial imperialist, and you are the apologist for colonial imperialism."
This last was of course your only point: You start with a preconceived invective — and fill in the space where others would put an argument with spurious verbiage...
Will Europe step up? What do you hope for, [iersi[/i]? (I can tell you, America is not coming to their rescue, this time...)
So: these "facts" that you think I've missed are basically my penchant for ignoring your emotional reactions to this and that... (! How dare I? Ignore your feelings, that is. Well, ersi, I feel no compunction to pussy-foot around the actual facts with such an obnoxious character...)
You know I'b long questioned the sense of the U.S.'s involvement in NATO. (You refuse to bring it up, because you have no arguments...) I think it's time for Europe to grow up (or, as I'd rather put it: To grow a pair!) If you are convinced that they can't or won't, recognize that that makes you a supplicant...
Your choice.