Skip to main content
Topic: TV Show Popularity in Your Neighborhood (Read 20507 times)

Re: TV Show Popularity in Your Neighborhood

Reply #25
So it's a show about how the nouveau riche are having trouble being accepted into high society?

Re: TV Show Popularity in Your Neighborhood

Reply #26
Are tv shows the same as tv series? If yes, I like The Game of Thrones.
Not as good as Roma, from the same producers I suppose, but the best thing that can be seen in television today.

Of course, with popularity, it will dive into an insupportable pastiche of itself.
A matter of attitude.

Re: TV Show Popularity in Your Neighborhood

Reply #27
Technically a series is a particular kind of show (i.e. a recurring one) but in the context of this post I don't think anyone is talking about one-time specials. :)

Re: TV Show Popularity in Your Neighborhood

Reply #28

Are tv shows the same as tv series? If yes, I like The Game of Thrones.
Not as good as Roma, from the same producers I suppose, but the best thing that can be seen in television today.

Of course, with popularity, it will dive into an insupportable pastiche of itself.
You could claim that A Song of Ice and Fire/The Game of Thrones is already a pastiche of the War of the Roses and other English and European history (and beyond to Asia and Africa). Westeros is a kind of a Late Medieval Europe with the sex, violence, and treachery dialled up.

If you like sexed-up history like Rome and sexed-up pseudo-history like GoT, as do I, you would probably enjoy series like The Tudors and The Borgias as well.

Re: TV Show Popularity in Your Neighborhood

Reply #29
You could claim that A Song of Ice and Fire/The Game of Thrones is already a pastiche of the War of the Roses and other English and European history (and beyond to Asia and Africa). Westeros is a kind of a Late Medieval Europe with the sex, violence, and treachery dialled up.

If you like sexed-up history like Rome and sexed-up pseudo-history like GoT, as do I, you would probably enjoy series like The Tudors and The Borgias as well.

GoT and Roma have their own merit that separates them (each one at it's way) from the other series you mention.
The inclusion of a decent amount of boobies is certainly welcome but it goes further than that.

Roma tried to be a portrait of the entire Roman society, with all social classes, while maintaining a reasonable amount of Historical likelihood. Fictionally, they created an ensemble of interconnected characters, ranging from the very low to the higher possible classes, who's mixed destinies explained History.
Innovative and brightly done. The other series you say just does the traditional, focusing on the life of the powerful, the usual thing.
The historical recreation of life at those times was brilliant.

Game of Thrones, yes it recreates a Middle age full of sex, violence and treason but it adds an element of fantastic. The formula is not new but the way it's done, is superb.
Instead a final product that would be sordid or, even worst, something like Lord of the Rings it results at probably the higher moment in fiction that television has ever created.
It's going to be very very difficult to do better. GoT is at a different championship.


Of course, as Mary Pickford says at my sig, I'm totally against what I above said. :)
A matter of attitude.

Re: TV Show Popularity in Your Neighborhood

Reply #30
I am purely pragmatic. If a sea of naked breasts is what it takes for ridiculously costly series to succeed, bring them on. Roman society, not to speak of Medieval European society in most centuries, was allegedly fairly puritan and hypocritical, and not the sequence of Roman orgies and debaucheries fantasised about, just like rock'n'roll usually isn't as rock'n'roll as legend would have it.

But as long as the characters think as Romans and not as thinly veiled morality play figurines in a toga, libertine liberties are quite acceptable. Likewise God and a mystical universe was real to the Medieval world, and people behaved thereafter. The characters might be villainous, nasty, and treacherous, but still unwilling to risk going to Hell.  The plot and the setting in these modern series might have upped the viewer attraction beyond the realistic, but still with  fidelity to the historical setting and world view. That is why I am less keen on The Vikings, which I should have been enthusiastic about, as it has too many shortcomings as TV and in reaching the appropriate mind space.

Re: TV Show Popularity in Your Neighborhood

Reply #31
Roman society, not to speak of Medieval European society in most centuries, was allegedly fairly puritan and hypocritical, and not the sequence of Roman orgies and debaucheries fantasised about, just like rock'n'roll usually isn't as rock'n'roll as legend would have it.

Maybe we were closer to the truth by saying that those societies were simultaneously puritan and hypocritical and a sequence of orgies and debaucheries.
Such is life and always has been and will be.
A matter of attitude.

Re: TV Show Popularity in Your Neighborhood

Reply #32
What's this TV thing? Quit talking nonsense, people :irked:

Re: TV Show Popularity in Your Neighborhood

Reply #33
During my holidays I had the time to watch some episodes from a French tv series very interesting, Un Village Français.

Life at the Jura during the German occupation at WWII.
So refreshing to listen to people speaking French against the anglo saxon attempt of cultural colonization.
A matter of attitude.

Re: TV Show Popularity in Your Neighborhood

Reply #34
I'm not sure if the second most influential language in the world necessarily counts as a valiant act of resistance. :P


Re: TV Show Popularity in Your Neighborhood

Reply #36
Some Estonian TV channel started showing Zelensky's famous series. It is a commercial TV channel, so I will probably not watch it. I might watch it by some other means, maybe.

This is an interesting common point that Zelensky has with Trump - both were TV stars before becoming president.[1] I know that Russians based their impressions of Zelensky on this fact - until the invasion.
This is more true of Zelensky than of Trump. Trump was more of a high-profile tabloid star than TV star. Trump's TV career with Apprentice was too long ago when he became president, while Zelensky's Servant of the People was much more recent and fresh in memory - and more widely popular and known to boot.

Re: TV Show Popularity in Your Neighborhood

Reply #37
The sun-baby in Netflix reboot of Teletubbies is a total disaster. People demand the old sun-baby back.


Re: TV Show Popularity in Your Neighborhood

Reply #38
I doubt I'd be able to tell the difference.

Re: TV Show Popularity in Your Neighborhood

Reply #39
Der gleiche Himmel about spy games between DDR and West Berlin. The first episode is promising.

If you enjoy Estonian subtitles, here you go https://jupiter.err.ee/1152509/seesama-taevas
If not, turn them off.

Sofia Hedin speaking German was a nice complement to her speaking Norwegian (well, Swedo-Norwegian, she played a Swedish princess) and English in other roles.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zqhncmYeBY



The Same Sky had promise, but didn't reach it. Enjoyable in a way, as all series set in Berlin are, but ultimately 🐴🐴🐯🐯 as they say in Chinese.

Speaking of which, we got Counterpart, which I enjoyed, but not enough others, so it got cancelled after two seasons.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRuaNHLp6OU


 

Re: TV Show Popularity in Your Neighborhood

Reply #40
Remember the good old times when Joe Rogan used to permit his producer to google up stuff to build context and to fact-check the conversation? The good times are conclusively over.

When I say that Marc Andreessen, the co-creator of the web-browser Mosaic, now another Trump crony from the Silicon Valley, lies about absolutely everything, I am exaggerating only to a negligible extent. Nothing in this conversation is true, except for a few dangling clauses.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ye8MOfxD5nU

At 1h34, Andreessen says, "There's now a category called a politically exposed person, PEP, and if you're a PEP you're required by financial regulators to be kicked out of bank."

Rogan, "What if you're politically on the left."

Andreessen, "Well, that's fine because they are not politically exposed."

The reality of PEP status among bank customers is that everybody with important political *position* is designated as PEP in the customer database. Your political *position* makes you a PEP, not your views. All government (cabinet members) are PEPs. All members of parliament, regardless of party or "independent" status, are PEPs. All leaders of political parties, i.e. when you are a leader of any officially registered political party, be it left or right, are PEPs. It's kind of similar status when above certain wealth level you get automatically allocated among Private Banking customers, i.e. VIP segment, with their respective privileges AND extra controls.

Knowing this, how can one say that banks are required to kick PEPs out of banks? One can say it when one does not know it or when one is deliberately lying their head off. And Joe Rogan's producer is not googling around any longer to verify information.

Trump won, so truth no longer matters. Anybody can say anything now and Americans are completely free to choose their narratives.

Re: TV Show Popularity in Your Neighborhood

Reply #41
That's sad, he seemed broadly okay in the past.