Skip to main content ↑ ↓
Topic: Split links (Read 1804 times)

Split links

This message refers to Jimbro's earlier message:
Quote from: Luxor on

Quote from: Jimbro3738 on
This kind of language doesn't belong here, Belfrager.

It's not needed that's for sure. But as it's the "free speech" thread, I'll try to ignore it. Not that I am condoning it though Belfrager.
Quoting it, doesn't really help matters.


Unfortunately for that reference Jimbro's message had just split. but the reference had taken no notice of that. It said
Code: [Select]
1019.msg41789#msg41789
but would have needed to be
Code: [Select]
1304.msg41789#msg41789
for the link to actually work, 1304 being the new thread.


In other words this would have been unbroken:
Quote from: Luxor on

Quote from: Jimbro3738 on
This kind of language doesn't belong here, Belfrager.

It's not needed that's for sure. But as it's the "free speech" thread, I'll try to ignore it. Not that I am condoning it though Belfrager.
Quoting it, doesn't really help matters.

 

Re: Split links

Reply #1 –
The current version of SMF stems from 2011. I wonder if the 2.1 beta, to which we'll upgrade after it stabilizes more, includes something like that.