Skip to main content
Topic: Statesmanship (Read 14666 times)
  • OakdaleFTL
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
Statesmanship
How would you define it? (King George III had said something which I'd agree…)

The following is George Washington's first inaugural address. Tell me -if you know of one- of another as eloquent, or in any other wise better!
Quote

  Address by George Washington, 1789

Fellow-Citizens of the Senate and of the House of Representatives:

Among the vicissitudes incident to life no event could have filled me with greater anxieties than that of which the notification was transmitted by your order, and received on the 14th day of the present month. On the one hand, I was summoned by my country, whose voice I can never hear but with veneration and love, from a retreat which I had chosen with the fondest predilection, and, in my flattering hopes, with an immutable decision, as the asylum of my declining years—a retreat which was rendered every day more necessary as well as more dear to me by the addition of habit to inclination, and of frequent interruptions in my health to the gradual waste committed on it by time. On the other hand, the magnitude and difficulty of the trust to which the voice of my country called me, being sufficient to awaken in the wisest and most experienced of her citizens a distrustful scrutiny into his qualifications, could not but overwhelm with despondence one who (inheriting inferior endowments from nature and unpracticed in the duties of civil administration) ought to be peculiarly conscious of his own deficiencies. In this conflict of emotions all I dare aver is that it has been my faithful study to collect my duty from a just appreciation of every circumstance by which it might be affected. All I dare hope is that if, in executing this task, I have been too much swayed by a grateful remembrance of former instances, or by an affectionate sensibility to this transcendent proof of the confidence of my fellow-citizens, and have thence too little consulted my incapacity as well as disinclination for the weighty and untried cares before me, my error will be palliated by the motives which mislead me, and its consequences be judged by my country with some share of the partiality in which they originated.

Such being the impressions under which I have, in obedience to the public summons, repaired to the present station, it would be peculiarly improper to omit in this first official act my fervent supplications to that Almighty Being who rules over the universe, who presides in the councils of nations, and whose providential aids can supply every human defect, that His benediction may consecrate to the liberties and happiness of the people of the United States a Government instituted by themselves for these essential purposes, and may enable every instrument employed in its administration to execute with success the functions allotted to his charge. In tendering this homage to the Great Author of every public and private good, I assure myself that it expresses your sentiments not less than my own, nor those of my fellow-citizens at large less than either. No people can be bound to acknowledge and adore the Invisible Hand which conducts the affairs of men more than those of the United States. Every step by which they have advanced to the character of an independent nation seems to have been distinguished by some token of providential agency; and in the important revolution just accomplished in the system of their united government the tranquil deliberations and voluntary consent of so many distinct communities from which the event has resulted can not be compared with the means by which most governments have been established without some return of pious gratitude, along with an humble anticipation of the future blessings which the past seem to presage. These reflections, arising out of the present crisis, have forced themselves too strongly on my mind to be suppressed. You will join with me, I trust, in thinking that there are none under the influence of which the proceedings of a new and free government can more auspiciously commence.

By the article establishing the executive department it is made the duty of the President “to recommend to your consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient.” The circumstances under which I now meet you will acquit me from entering into that subject further than to refer to the great constitutional charter under which you are assembled, and which, in defining your powers, designates the objects to which your attention is to be given. It will be more consistent with those circumstances, and far more congenial with the feelings which actuate me, to substitute, in place of a recommendation of particular measures, the tribute that is due to the talents, the rectitude, and the patriotism which adorn the characters selected to devise and adopt them. In these honorable qualifications I behold the surest pledges that as on one side no local prejudices or attachments, no separate views nor party animosities, will misdirect the comprehensive and equal eye which ought to watch over this great assemblage of communities and interests, so, on another, that the foundation of our national policy will be laid in the pure and immutable principles of private morality, and the preeminence of free government be exemplified by all the attributes which can win the affections of its citizens and command the respect of the world. I dwell on this prospect with every satisfaction which an ardent love for my country can inspire, since there is no truth more thoroughly established than that there exists in the economy and course of nature an indissoluble union between virtue and happiness; between duty and advantage; between the genuine maxims of an honest and magnanimous policy and the solid rewards of public prosperity and felicity; since we ought to be no less persuaded that the propitious smiles of Heaven can never be expected on a nation that disregards the eternal rules of order and right which Heaven itself has ordained; and since the preservation of the sacred fire of liberty and the destiny of the republican model of government are justly considered, perhaps, as deeply, as finally, staked on the experiment entrusted to the hands of the American people.

Besides the ordinary objects submitted to your care, it will remain with your judgment to decide how far an exercise of the occasional power delegated by the fifth article of the Constitution is rendered expedient at the present juncture by the nature of objections which have been urged against the system, or by the degree of inquietude which has given birth to them. Instead of undertaking particular recommendations on this subject, in which I could be guided by no lights derived from official opportunities, I shall again give way to my entire confidence in your discernment and pursuit of the public good; for I assure myself that whilst you carefully avoid every alteration which might endanger the benefits of an united and effective government, or which ought to await the future lessons of experience, a reverence for the characteristic rights of freemen and a regard for the public harmony will sufficiently influence your deliberations on the question how far the former can be impregnably fortified or the latter be safely and advantageously promoted.

To the foregoing observations I have one to add, which will be most properly addressed to the House of Representatives. It concerns myself, and will therefore be as brief as possible. When I was first honored with a call into the service of my country, then on the eve of an arduous struggle for its liberties, the light in which I contemplated my duty required that I should renounce every pecuniary compensation. From this resolution I have in no instance departed; and being still under the impressions which produced it, I must decline as inapplicable to myself any share in the personal emoluments which may be indispensably included in a permanent provision for the executive department, and must accordingly pray that the pecuniary estimates for the station in which I am placed may during my continuance in it be limited to such actual expenditures as the public good may be thought to require.

Having thus imparted to you my sentiments as they have been awakened by the occasion which brings us together, I shall take my present leave; but not without resorting once more to the benign Parent of the Human Race in humble supplication that, since He has been pleased to favor the American people with opportunities for deliberating in perfect tranquillity, and dispositions for deciding with unparalleled unanimity on a form of government for the security of their union and the advancement of their happiness, so His divine blessing may be equally conspicuous in the enlarged views, the temperate consultations, and the wise measures on which the success of this Government must depend.
(source)


 
进行 ...
"Humor is emotional chaos remembered in tranquility." - James Thurber
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts!" - Richard Feynman
 (iBook G4 - Panther | Mac mini i5 - El Capitan)

Re: Statesmanship

Reply #25


Yeah right Colonel. Anything to detract from hypocrisy land. Just look at your own history.

All those early corporates and rich making a new country when they met in Philly and stated that only whites could be citizens and be given. Kind of gives a clue as to why racism is such a big deal over there even today.
The Red Indians. Misused, land stolen, massacred. The blacks suffered horrendously too in vast numbers and aye in the North too so they cannot be smart alecs.
-The aim in the 1930's to replace the BE with one of your own via corporates and military pressure.
- Even right into the middle of the 20th century burnings, no votes for many.
- More killed in the Civil War than overseas wars.
-Wars started, military dictatorships supported yet guffing the world with the talk about rights, freedoms and people having to fight for them back home.
-Spend half the globe's military bill.
--Dare not to accept your ideas then expect to be barricaded, made iunstable or invaded.
-A million a year losing homes.
-Greedy bankers funded and gap between rich and poor vastly increasing.
-2.4 million in jail.
-People on death row for up to 10 years and longer. Dear, oh dear. A legal system that is a joke.
-More secret service agencies than any other nation and includes spying on their own people via house phones, mobile phones, net, credit cards, etc. The latest incident involves an Internet company taking the German Government to court for allegedly pasing info to your Gestapo, oops, NSA lot.
- The hill ruled by millionaires and little independent political stuff allowed outside the big two.
-Trillions in debt.
-Army on streets and police looking increasingly like a military State.
- Flags everywhere like kids at a carnival and an overblown nationalism. Even in every school classrm. Hey are you all simple?!
The contradictions of all the high principled stuff is constantly ridiculed by the sheer hypocrisy and efforts to control the world.  You don't really have much of a political choice in reality. Maybe you should try forming a Commonwealth without corruption and military efforts - nah, would get disappointed!

Now for a sip at my diet Irn Bru and a smiling sigh at the usual hypocrisy but you folk cannot help it as you are brained from an early age.  One real sadness and almost with a capital S to emphasise is the unfortunate losing of the Civil War by one side. Chaining up the confederate President, carpet baggers, defraduing and persecuting legions. You can join the club but want out of the great democracy? Nah, nae chance.

If nothing else, you are exceedingly consistent. Gotta give ya that.

The question is, is all of that guff typed out each time, or is it saved in a Word document?   :eek: :D

It's generated by a machine, a mindless automaton.

Re: Statesmanship

Reply #26
It's generated by a machine, a mindless automaton.
It is not! A "mindless" automaton would not be so consistently irksome…
Howie only seeks to pique others! (He'd likely prick 'em too, if he had the means! :) )
进行 ...
"Humor is emotional chaos remembered in tranquility." - James Thurber
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts!" - Richard Feynman
 (iBook G4 - Panther | Mac mini i5 - El Capitan)

Re: Statesmanship

Reply #27
I was wrong.
These long lists of unrelated phrases seem to be appearing regularly, sometimes in Russian.
If you look carefully (at the English ones) there seems to be a common thread of references to pharmaceutical products or to pornography.
But not, I think, in the post under discussion.
It seems to have as much relevance to anything as do the Russian ones.

Re: Statesmanship

Reply #28
Funny that you should say that, TT. It sure looks like RJH copypastes right out of the Marxist/Leninist/Stalinist handbook--- which is funny because as a monarchist he would be top of the list of people the M/L/S squads would be looking to at least "re-educate" if not outright----ahhh, heck, there's just no nice way to say what those folk do to people they disagree with.
What would happen if a large asteroid slammed into the Earth?
According to several tests involving a watermelon and a large hammer, it would be really bad!

Re: Statesmanship

Reply #29
Putinism for dummies?



Re: Statesmanship

Reply #32
I'm sure he's a nice-enough fellow, to people he's met. But on the net he's someone who'd be in knife fights every night… (Thankfully, the net doesn't provide such a venue. Yet.)
The main reason we (…all of us!) disagree about statesmanship is simple: While we agree about winners and losers, we disagree about what should have happened.
In other words, we're arguing about counter factual propositions.
进行 ...
"Humor is emotional chaos remembered in tranquility." - James Thurber
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts!" - Richard Feynman
 (iBook G4 - Panther | Mac mini i5 - El Capitan)

Re: Statesmanship

Reply #33

I'm sure he's a nice-enough fellow, to people he's met. But on the net he's someone who'd be in knife fights every night… (Thankfully, the net doesn't provide such a venue. Yet.)

The internet provides a venue for people to have each other for dinner.

Quote from: Victim of cannibal agreed to be eaten, http://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/dec/04/germany.lukeharding

In one of the most extraordinary trials in German criminal history, the self-confessed cannibal admitted that he had met a 43-year-old Berlin engineer, Bernd Brandes, after advertising on the internet, and had chopped him up and eaten him.


Re: Statesmanship

Reply #34
And German food isn't all that appetizing. Cannibals might disagree, however.

 

Re: Statesmanship

Reply #35
Orbán conceded easily, as a decent politician should. He had no chances after Vance's visit and Trump's endorsement. Europe is not Trumpite.