Skip to main content
Topic: NATO nonsense (Read 50319 times)

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #250
Even if the U.S. deserts NATO, a core of European nations  would continue it. Begrudgingly, perhaps; but competently.
European best defense - the enemy thinks we are competent.
Let's hope God keeps it that way.
A matter of attitude.

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #251
Ill passingly say this Oakdale and that is that Russia is still the largest country in the world and has a  commercial growth potential.

Prior to the 1st World War the US President stated that if Russia kept going the way it was with such an increase in productivity and growth within about twenty or so years be the most advanced commercially on Earth. Didn't matter when Russia imperial or under the Red thugs or today after Communism collapsed each of those three we in the West had a negative so sill being head-banging ridiculous.
"Quit you like men:be strong"

 

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #252
a  commercial growth potential.
Only if Biden wins...
we in the West had a negative so sill being head-banging ridiculous
Speak for your own wee nation. The U.S. is still doing fine, and if Trump wins again I expect we'll do better still!
Heck, we could even afford to stay in NATO... Speaking of which (I know: Off Topic!), Your lot down south and the French still make airplanes? I'd hate to see NATO forces stuck with the over-priced and finicky F-35s.

进行 ...
"Humor is emotional chaos remembered in tranquility." - James Thurber
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts!" - Richard Feynman
 (iBook G4 - Panther | Mac mini i5 - El Capitan)

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #253
Speaking of which (I know: Off Topic!), Your lot down south and the French still make airplanes?
Plenty of fighter jets being made in Europe. The Eurofighter Typhoon is probably the main one, although that one has been argued to be quite a lot of compromises in being multifunctional. Belgium's opted for F-35As though, mainly due to a supposedly lower price.

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #254
At US $78 to $101 million per? (I've obviously not kept up with the market for such!) :)
进行 ...
"Humor is emotional chaos remembered in tranquility." - James Thurber
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts!" - Richard Feynman
 (iBook G4 - Panther | Mac mini i5 - El Capitan)

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #255
The Typhoon has a similar price. When you're buying 50-100 of the things a million more or less means a free plane. :P

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #256
Would say your country did well under Trump for some time on job providing but there are dear Oakdale and military a big thing as spend so much on that. However how is it the tens of millions bad off and on food stamps don't get reduced?
"Quit you like men:be strong"

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #257
how is it the tens of millions bad off and on food stamps don't get reduced?
War has always been a state's dearest expense, RJ! Even in feudal times, the the Seven Years' cost everyone sums that couldn't be called tidy. (You might know it better -as might I-as the French and Indian War...) Were it not for the earlier introduction of the Peruvian tuber called "potato" the Prussian peasantry might have perished from the earth.
Imagine all the flute concerti we'd have lost!

(You do that your "knowledge" of America's poor is -well- poor! :) I dare say that as a proportion of the nation's population the U.S.A.'s is smaller the Scotland's... Would you check for me, Howie?)
进行 ...
"Humor is emotional chaos remembered in tranquility." - James Thurber
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts!" - Richard Feynman
 (iBook G4 - Panther | Mac mini i5 - El Capitan)

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #258
The aerospace industry is pretty large in Europe as it is in the US. Same issues too. Concentration on ever-fewer companies, and the question whether fighter airplanes are becoming the aircraft carriers of future wars (extremely expensive, of limited utility, potentially vulnerable, but great at projecting force).

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #259
You are skipping things Oakdale!

Does not matter a hoot which of the big two commercial parties in power tens of millions of poor and so on - doesn't change a dashed bit but massive amounts on military and considering half the world military expense is the USA tut, tut.
"Quit you like men:be strong"

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #260
You are skipping things Oakdale!
I am not! I know this dance*, and so should you! Pretending that the world consists of only social workers and nurses (...I can't he'p m'sef' guys: The gals we'd all court would probably not accept our woo!) I'm not claiming they -those I'll mention shortly- are beneath me. I'm just saying that it takes a certain kind of man to make and keep a comfortable acquaintance with hookers, whores, gold-diggers and ball-busters. To maintain a relationship with one takes a special kind of man... And who among us is that certain? That special?
International relations are similar, no? :)
Howie, you don't seem to woo...
Although you confess a discerning appreciation of the fairer sex, your noted exploits are gentlemanly but distant... (Bobby, girls like to get close! See if I'm wrong.)
But if you won't: Is it lack of enthusiasm? Your vigor or valor vitiated? Google tells me some common synonyms of vitiate are corrupt, debase, debauch, deprave, and pervert. While all these words mean "to cause deterioration or lowering in quality or character," vitiate implies a destruction of purity, validity, or effectiveness by allowing entrance of a fault or defect.
What I suspect is that you tried "Woo! Woo!" and they thought you were a train aficionado! So, you took up a hobby!

(Is it even possible to carry my original metaphor through to the conclusion I made? :) Unlikely, I think! But also, it's quite unlikely than anyone other than the likes of me would even consider it...  :jester:  :troll:  :alien:  :devil:  )

* It's a square dance! More than four corners is likely to lead to a general commotion... In context, a conflagration.
进行 ...
"Humor is emotional chaos remembered in tranquility." - James Thurber
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts!" - Richard Feynman
 (iBook G4 - Panther | Mac mini i5 - El Capitan)

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #261
I have given four women in my life the great value (as it of course!). Heavens even had one I was going with and she had a female  friend wished it was her with me  :D  :blush:
"Quit you like men:be strong"

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #262
Why are you guys not permaliking the above post? :)

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #263
Maybe when you get to leaving school things will be better for you!
"Quit you like men:be strong"

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #264
Russia demands NATO roll back from East Europe and stay out of Ukraine
Quote
https://www.reuters.com/world/russia-unveils-security-guarantees-says-western-response-not-encouraging-2021-12-17/
Moscow handed over its proposals to the United States this week as tensions rose over the Russian troop build-up near Ukraine.

It says it is responding to what it sees as threats to its own security from Ukraine's increasingly close relations with NATO and aspirations to become an alliance member, even though there is no imminent prospect of Kyiv being allowed to join.

The Russian proposals were set out in two documents - a draft agreement with NATO countries and a draft treaty with the United States, both published by the foreign ministry.

The first, among other points, would require Russia and NATO not to deploy additional troops and weapons outside the countries where they were in May 1997 - before the accession to NATO of any of the former communist states in East Europe that for decades were dominated by Moscow. It would mean NATO abandoning any military activities in Ukraine, Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and Central Asia.

[...]

Some Western political analysts suggested Russia was knowingly presenting unrealistic demands which it knew would not be met to provide a diplomatic distraction while maintaining military pressure on Ukraine.

"Something is very wrong with this picture, the pol(itical) side appears to be a smokescreen," Michael Kofman, a Russia specialist at Virginia-based research organization CNA, wrote on Twitter.

Sam Greene, professor of Russian politics at King's College London, said President Vladimir Putin was "drawing a line around the post-Soviet space and planting a 'keep out' sign".

"It's not meant to be a treaty: it's a declaration," he said. "But that doesn’t necessarily mean this is a prelude to war. It’s a justification for keeping Moscow’s hair-trigger stance, in order to keep Washington and others off balance."

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #265
Re the previous post: Germany obeys.

Germany Blocks NATO Ally From Transferring Weapons to Ukraine
Germany is blocking North Atlantic Treaty Organization ally Estonia from giving military support to Ukraine by refusing to issue permits for German-origin weapons to be exported to Kyiv as it braces for a potential Russian invasion.

Unlike the U.S., Britain, Poland and other allies, the German government has declined to export lethal weapons directly to Ukraine.

In the case of Estonia, a small country on Russia’s northern border, Berlin is also refusing to allow a third country to send artillery to Ukraine because the weaponry originated in Germany, according to Estonian and German officials.
In Estonia it was clear all along that Germany is Putin's ally more than anyone else's. NATO does not work as an alliance. The EU is broken by design. Those who are consistently in the wrong dictate the terms and call the shots.

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #266
That is how the weapons control system works, when it works. If the rules say that weapons cannot be delivered to a country, they cannot be delivered through a third country either, in this case Estonia.

Swedish weapons (with similar weapons controls) on the other hand are on the way to Ukraine via UK. Germany also disallows airspace for military flights, which doesn't matter as Denmark and Sweden allow them. In short Germany has a hard neutrality that doesn't really matter, while Denmark and Sweden have the neutrality of looking the other way.

Germany has gone further in economic pressure than I expected, which will matter more than German arms. That Germany doesn't want to be visibly engaged in a confrontation with Russia doesn't really weaken Ukrainian position.

The proxy war between Turkey (Azerbaijan) and Armenia (Russia) in 2020 was a decisive victory to Turkey. Russian tanks are not invulnerable. The Russian air force pretty much is though, if at a high political cost.

Why Germany refuses weapons deliveries to Ukraine 

France is more important, and tends to be Russia friendly. Not so much now.


Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #267
That is how the weapons control system works, when it works.
You mean a country's weapons control system wrt weapons the country itself produces? The thing is, Germany is a NATO country. So, either NATO works or it doesn't.

From another angle, there's also what was imposed on Germany after WWII, so one might question how or why Germany has any say in military matters. Germany should not even have weapons to the extent that a (German) weapons control system could become a thing.

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #268
From another angle, there's also what was imposed on Germany after WWII, so one might question how or why Germany has any say in military matters.
This is what always struck me as the utmost idiocy about Obama and Trump's nonsensical claims. Germany isn't spending 2% of its GDP on its military? Gee, who'd have thought, that's exactly how we wanted it![1] Suggesting that Germany should spend more than France in absolute numbers is just ignorant madness, at the very least until we have European army. I have no idea what they're smoking over in Washington.
Where "we" means the US at least as much as the rest of Western Europe.

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #269
This is what always struck me as the utmost idiocy about Obama and Trump's nonsensical claims. Germany isn't spending 2% of its GDP on its military? Gee, who'd have thought, that's exactly how we wanted it!
I thought the same thing. Obama and Trump made it sound as if the military spending of NATO members go straight to the budget of USA, and failure to keep up with the expenses means lack of loyalty to USA. It is not inconceivable that it works something like this in practice. However, it is especially dangerous to accuse Germany of too little military spending. Did they forget the two world wars?

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #270
Germany is a NATO country. So, either NATO works or it doesn't.

Germany is a NATO country, but Ukraine is not (not for lack of trying). Russia made that point quite clear with the invasion of Georgia in 2008. NATO is not in the position to defend Georgia, so a Georgian membership is not an option. The only way Ukraine would be joining NATO would be in the aftermath of a Russian invasion.

This is what always struck me as the utmost idiocy about Obama and Trump's nonsensical claims. Germany isn't spending 2% of its GDP on its military? Gee, who'd have thought, that's exactly how we wanted it! Suggesting that Germany should spend more than France in absolute numbers is just ignorant madness, at the very least until we have European army.

Germany will still hold a low profile, though this is gradually changing, decade by decade. The 2%/GDP goal for 2024 is some sense (if you are a member of a mutual defence organisation you should be able to provide some of that defence) and more nonsense (a higher defence budget doesn't necessarily mean an increased ability to provide that support).

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #271
The only way Ukraine would be joining NATO would be in the aftermath of a Russian invasion.
This is the aftermath. Russia already invaded Ukraine nearly a decade ago. There are no signs of NATO learning from any of the Russian invasions.

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #272
Fair point. I was thinking of Putin biting over more than he could chew. The blowback could quite possibly lead to Ukrainian NATO membership further ahead.

The former United Socialist Soviet Republic is littered with Moscow-friendly separatist entities, Transnistria, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, and more recently the Free and Happy State of Donbas. (Nagorno-Karabakh predates the Russian Federation, but has been useful.) Basically you're with Putin or in trouble.

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #273
I'm somewhat surprised at how little discussion of the Russian invasion of Ukraine is going on, here, where I'd expect better understanding (and information!) than one gets from American sources...
But shall we begin with Taras Kuzio's interview at the Telegraph's Off Script program — ahem! programme!
进行 ...
"Humor is emotional chaos remembered in tranquility." - James Thurber
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts!" - Richard Feynman
 (iBook G4 - Panther | Mac mini i5 - El Capitan)

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #274
You might say we missed the ball.

Here's some effective propaganda from Ukraine:


And here's a song celebrating Ukrainian Turkish drones:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=890z0skXQzI

Russian attacks are endangering Ukraine’s world-leading medicinal chemistry industry, which supplies scientists across the globe with molecular building blocks needed for early drug development.