Skip to main content

Poll

Will there be…

…more beer?
[ 6 ] (100%)
…less beer?
[ 0 ] (0%)

Total Members Voted: 5

Topic: The world in 2030 (Read 59044 times)

Re: The world in 2030

Reply #151
Britain will have been gone in those future years having sunk below the waves due to the damn population growth.
"Quit you like men:be strong"

Re: The world in 2030

Reply #152
In 14 years, no less. Britain's population is basically flat, meaning comprising a smaller and smaller share of world population, and a smaller and smaller share of world economy, and politically is reduced from hegemon to major power to minor power.

Which isn't necessarily bad. While Mr. Ferguson seems to think otherwise, there is no reason a less significant country should be worse off than a more significant country, but unless the British populace would get extremely much fatter in the years to come, their weight in 2030 would be pretty much the same as now.

Re: The world in 2030

Reply #153
Population will be flat -eh? In the 1950's ot was still around 48 million now it is into over 60 million on this island. That is ridiculous and the experts are saying it will be 70 million. May I remind you of the size of this place and there is a damn difference between 48 and 70 million on the island.  Immigrants are having far bigger families, more welfare, costs to education, prisons (ate, prisons), welfare costs, public housing and so on.In 30 years time instead of buying kids prams maybe life jackets and dinghies when we sink.
"Quit you like men:be strong"

Re: The world in 2030

Reply #154
Britain in 1950 had a population of 51 million, it was the 9th largest country by population on the planet.

Britain in 2016 has a population of 65 million, falling down to 22nd position, and having a tepid growth of 27% over 66 years.  The prediction for 2030 is a population of 70 million and actually regaining a position to 21st (at least Britain can overcome Thailand and France in population).

The world population in 1950 was  2526 million. Today it is 7125, nearly triple the population (282%). It is predicted to be 8675 in 2030.

In other words in 1950 one out of 50 people in the world would be British. That was a small island with great clout. Today it is 1 out of 110, not even 1%. By 2030 one out of 124 would be British.

Even more dramatic is the fall of economic power. To save myself some work, I'll just quote Wikipedia (quoting US Dept/Agriculture)

Quote
  • The United States represented 48.69% of the world's economy in 1960 (highest point), and was at its lowest point at 21.42% in 2011.
  • The European Union represented 34.6% of the world's GDP at 1980 (highest point), and was at its lowest in 1985 at 25.01%.
  • China represented 1.618% of the world's economy in 1987 (lowest point), rising to 11.47% in 2012 (highest point). According to Angus Maddison, China represented 32.9% of the world's economy in 1820.
  • Japan represented 17.8% of the world's economy in 1994 (highest point), after that its contribution to the world's economy has gradually diminished, and reached its lowest point in 2012 (8.32%). Although the very lowest since 1960 has been in the year 1960 when it produced 3.28% of the world's GDP.
  • Germany represented 8.98% of the world's economy in 1969 (highest point), falling to 4.74% in 2012 (lowest point)
  • The United Kingdom represented 6.42% of the world's economy in 1960 (highest point), falling to 3.42% in 2012 (lowest point). According to Angus Maddison the United Kingdom accounted for 9.1% of the world's economy in 1870.
  • France represented 5.8% of the world's economy in 1969. After rising to 5.94% in 1974, its contribution to the world's economy fell to 3.64% in 2012 (lowest point). According to Angus Maddison France represented 6.5% of the world's economy in 1870
  • Italy represented 5.11% of the world's economy in 1969. After rising to 5.18% in 1974, its contribution to the world's economy fell to 2.81% in 2012 (lowest point).
  • Canada represented 2.63% of the world's economy in 1969. This figure has been generally stable, having peaked at 2.76% in 1981 and 2002, and being at its lowest (2.55%) in 1992. In 2012 Canada's share was 2.54%.
  • The Soviet Union represented 14.31% of the world's economy in 1969 (highest point) and at the year of its dissolution (1991) only produced 3.58% of the world's economy (lowest point). In 2012 Russia's share was 2.82% (highest point) and reached a nadir in 1998 (1.38%) before ending up at [9]1.9% in 2010.
  • India represented 3.1% of the world's economy in 1964 (highest point), and had its lowest world economy share at 1.00% in 1992. According to Angus Maddison, India represented 32.9% of the world's economy in 0 CE.

Re: The world in 2030

Reply #155
Your comment is pointless when you consider the size of this island and 70 million is gong to be damn ridiculous so all the guff about comparisons is pointless when the size of a place is more telling. We are getting over populated and the costs in everything are  utterly ridiculous. The sheer cost of all those who come her and bloat things with big families are a problem. You chose to ignore the cost on housing, health, education welfare costs. So your stats mean little in hard practice.
"Quit you like men:be strong"

Re: The world in 2030

Reply #156
The (American) world by 2030 will be made of 300 millions of Trump's clones.
We can see already a few ones at DnD, a world premiére.
A matter of attitude.

Re: The world in 2030

Reply #157
When you consider the amount of support that man is getting it does not augur well nor for the future.
"Quit you like men:be strong"

Re: The world in 2030

Reply #158
The (American) world by 2030 will be made of 300 millions of Trump's clones.
We can see already a few ones at DnD, a world.
=========
The 2030 population projection is 360 million. Following the 2016 election I'll get back to you on the number of likely Trumpites in 2030.

I suggest that we build a wall around Trump and make Mexico pay for it.

Re: The world in 2030

Reply #159
It will serve nothing.
You'll need to know How to Exit the Matrix
Read the first chapter, The Matrix,  it's what matters.
A matter of attitude.

Re: The world in 2030

Reply #160
8 predictions for the world in 2030

Quote
1. All products will have become services. “I don't own anything. I don't own a car. I don't own a house. I don't own any appliances or any clothes,”

2. There is a global price on carbon. China took the lead in 2017 with a market for trading the right to emit a tonne of CO2

3. US dominance is over. We have a handful of global powers. Nation states will have staged a comeback, writes Robert Muggah, Research Director at the Igarapé Institute. Instead of a single force, a handful of countries – the U.S., Russia, China, Germany, India and Japan chief among them – show semi-imperial tendencies.

4. Farewell hospital, hello home-spital.Technology will have further disrupted disease, writes Melanie Walker, a medical doctor and World Bank advisor.

5. We are eating much less meat. Rather like our grandparents, we will treat meat as a treat rather than a staple, writes Tim Benton, Professor of Population Ecology at the University of Leeds, UK.

6. Today’s Syrian refugees, 2030’s CEOs.Highly educated Syrian refugees will have come of age by 2030, making the case for the economic integration of those who have been forced to flee conflict.

7. The values that built the West will have been tested to breaking point. We forget the checks and balances that bolster our democracies at our peril, writes Kenneth Roth, Executive Director of Human Rights Watch.

8. “By the 2030s, we'll be ready to move humans toward the Red Planet.” What’s more, once we get there, we’ll probably discover evidence of alien life


Re: The world in 2030

Reply #161
Nº 7 denies the six earlier predictions...
Nº 8 it's comedy, not a prediction. :)
A matter of attitude.

Re: The world in 2030

Reply #162
Why? Matt Damon got there and back.

Re: The world in 2030

Reply #163
I'm tired of predictions, still waiting for the year 2000 flying cars everywhere.
A matter of attitude.

Re: The world in 2030

Reply #164
Don't you remember our great baseball player Yogi Berra? He said (among other things…) "Prediction is hard… Especially about the future!"

(No Jetsons, yet? Drat! On a somewhat serious note: I'm still bemused, that we -meaning no nation- has a lunar colony… Apparently, we'd prefer to squander our minerals on inter-national confrontation!)

Bel, get used to it! (You should have already.

I'm watching television, myself: Re-runs of Peter Gunn. (It probably doesn't mean anything to you, but it was the first prime time show my mom let me stay up to watch… :) )
进行 ...
"Humor is emotional chaos remembered in tranquility." - James Thurber
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts!" - Richard Feynman
 (iBook G4 - Panther | Mac mini i5 - El Capitan)

Re: The world in 2030

Reply #165
Don't you remember our great baseball player Yogi Berra? He said (among other things...) "Prediction is hard... Especially about the future!"
We have a football player known by the phrase "predictions? only at the end of the game..."

It seems that sport generates first class philosophers all over the world.
A matter of attitude.

Re: The world in 2030

Reply #166

Re: The world in 2030

Reply #167
I sense a delay. You tweeted that weeks ago iirc? :P

Re: The world in 2030

Reply #168
No, just a condensed version of the same Danish priest and former minister (but in this one she keeps her clothes and foregoes privacy):
Quote
All products will have become services. “I don't own anything. I don't own a car. I don't own a house. I don't own any appliances or any clothes,”

But true, sometimes there has been significant delays from tweet to DnD. Then again, 2030 has been a long time coming.

Re: The world in 2030

Reply #169
We have some people here already whishing for the nightmare 2030.
Complete nightmare, with Chinese and statistics included.
A matter of attitude.

Re: The world in 2030

Reply #170


We are now a quarter of the way from thread start to 2030. Has the progress been according to expectation? What about the future 3/4?

Re: The world in 2030

Reply #171
By that date where I live will be a mess, overcrowded  and people with routine principles on issues will be so labelled and the place so in bits things will be pointless.
"Quit you like men:be strong"

Re: The world in 2030

Reply #172
You must be heavily a city person. You think when the worst stench and dirt from the cities is reducing, that the world is doing okay?
Far from it. We might well be fucked if we (or perhaps more to the point, the Americans and the Chinese) don't change things around significantly. That's an entirely different question.

I was born and grew up deep in the countryside. I have had little phases here and there, but basically I live at the same spot where I was born. The forests have been drastically reduced here in the past 20 years.
So did I. The forests there have drastically increased over the past century, and I'm not talking production forests. Of course, that's not a global or even national phenomenon.

The urban effects on the countryside are global now. Maybe I am expressing myself too crudely, but I haven't seen any reliable measures of reduced pollution in the world. It's only increasing. Oil, plastics, and other poisons are not being given up - quite to the contrary. At the same time, there's a trend to present this or that pretty spot or project as "the way of the future", but it should be evident that those are just PR and marketing. All pretty spots in the world are monetised for tourism - and thus polluted.
The Pacific has been largely fished empty by industrial fishing boats. Jellyfish are overtaking the seas, and the amount of trash out there is humongous. Still a different question.

I guess that is a 3/3 to @Frenzie so far. The forested area of Europe is growing, though that was known in 2014, so not really prognostication.

I was about to joke that it has been sustained long enough for somebody to make that a problem, and sure enough I found this (though that is more on the topic of managed forestry in the past): 'Wrong type of trees' in Europe increased global warming

 

Re: The world in 2030

Reply #173
Trees don't really need to be planted or managed all that much. They mostly just spring up.

Re: The world in 2030

Reply #174
Trees are a different thing than a forest. Forest is an ecosystem.

Trees are the same as forest for people who think only in terms of monetisable timber. They don't think in terms of ecosystem.

No way to agree on the data, interpretation of the data, trends, or conclusions, when we don't agree on basic terms. In Estonian statistics they say that forest areas are increasing now, but this after they redefined what forest is, so whatever.