Skip to main content
Topic: NATO nonsense (Read 50316 times)

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #125
Russia is not a threat to world peace it is the loony stuff coming out of DC and the rest of us in the West just tally along with as poodles.
But…but — aren't you talking about countries with "wide" democracy? :)

I hear-tell, that 40 million Russian citizens recently participated in "civil defense" exercises against a nuclear attack… If anti-ballistic missile technology is "provocative," what is this? I mean, besides Russian paranoia? (Or do they still fear China as an aggressor? :) )

Tell Crimea and the rest of Ukraine that… And what would Russia do to maintain its only Mediterranean port, in Syria?
Your understanding of Russia's foreign policy (as well as America's) extends to the suburbs of Glasgow; and we know -because you told us- folks thereabout twice rejected you for political office! (A good example of your "wide" democracy, I'd say!) You only have prejudices… But you're consistent: You'll bash your "enemy," the U.S., even if it means extolling the "virtues" of your "friend," Russia!
(You'd be a Trump voter, if you could; in the hopes that The Donald would "deal" with Putin… :) )
进行 ...
"Humor is emotional chaos remembered in tranquility." - James Thurber
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts!" - Richard Feynman
 (iBook G4 - Panther | Mac mini i5 - El Capitan)

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #126
the Admiral Kuznetsov, in this very moment being under close surveillance by the Portuguese Marine and Air Force
:D

While Europe keeps accepting the USA as part of the democratic western world, therefore an ally, Nato is fundamental.
Neither are we considered nor are we treated as allies (f*ck the EU).
We are vassals. From your point of view it's an existential vassalage...

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #127
Russia is not a threat to world peace it is the loony stuff coming out of DC and the rest of us in the West just tally along with as poodles.
Tell Crimea and the rest of Ukraine that…
For Crimeans Russia was a savior. They are happy for leaving that mess.
As for the Ukraine it is in a worse shape it ever was. You are aware that the country is bankrupt, aren't you?
For US geostrategy it is a success but for the Ukrainians it is a mess. However, geostrategic interests are the only thing that matters for the USA.
Speaking of the Ukraine - who will finance endlessly that bankrupt and second largest country in Europe?
Germany? France? Italy? The UK? Portugal? Greece? Poland? The USA?
Who will pay for their gas bill this year? Winter is comming, ya know?

And what would Russia do to maintain its only Mediterranean port, in Syria?
Napalm like the USA did in Fallujah?  :left:   Depleted uranium after US paragon?  :left:

However the adequate question would be - what would the USA do after setting the whole region on fire for "regime changes"?
Without US involvement we wouldn't witness a civil war in Syria today, no Islamic State. Plans for regime change were drawn already before 2012.
So how far will the USA go to engineer its geostrategic interests in the region?

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #128
You are so spot on krake regarding Crimea and I said while ago that it was a Godsend for the province to GO BACK to Russia where the majority always wanted to be. America only takes an interest in referendums if it suits THEM. Crimeans will be better off in the long run and even pensions are higher and Russia building a bridge  over the sea. The wonderfully principled West leader, America fully supported the insurrection against the Ukraine Government when that mess started. I am not saying that the then government was A1 but it was a democratic decision. Now Ukraine is deep in debt, corrupt as hell and has neo-Nazis in parliament/government. Ukrainians still celebrate their own WW2 Nazi leader who was also responsible for their own SS units.

Trump for all his passing negatives IS right that a President should be trying to discuss with the President of Russia. The media is a top of the range expert system constantly attacking Russia for not damn good reason as it is a country they cannot control politically or in the corporate sphere. NATO is a hang over from the past and a financial waste of money never mind anything else.  The attitude towards Putin and Russia is a tormented and specially created hysteria to take minds off other things and NATO should have been scrubbed years ago.
"Quit you like men:be strong"

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #129
As for the Ukraine it is in a worse shape it ever was.
You're young; Howie's old. Neither of you know much of history…
Quote
Starting from the late 1920s with a centrally planned economy, Ukraine was involved in Soviet industrialisation and the republic's industrial output quadrupled during the 1930s. The peasantry suffered from the programme of collectivisation of agriculture which began during and was part of the first five-year plan and was enforced by regular troops and secret police. Those who resisted were arrested and deported and agricultural productivity greatly declined. As members of the collective farms were not allowed to receive any grain until sometimes unrealistic quotas were met, millions starved to death in a famine known as Holodomor or "Great Famine".

Scholars are divided as to whether this famine fits the definition of genocide, but the Ukrainian parliament and other countries have declared it as such.

The Communist leadership perceived famine as a means of class struggle and used starvation as a punishment tool to force peasants into collective farms.
Two future leaders of the Soviet Union, Nikita Khrushchev (pre-war CPSU chief in Ukraine) and Leonid Brezhnev (an engineer from Kamianske) depicted together.

Largely the same groups were responsible for the mass killing operations during the civil war, collectivisation, and the Great Terror. These groups were associated with Yefim Yevdokimov (1891–1939) and operated in the Secret Operational Division within General State Political Administration (OGPU) in 1929–31. Evdokimov transferred into Communist Party administration in 1934, when he became Party secretary for North Caucasus Krai. He appears to have continued advising Joseph Stalin and Nikolai Yezhov on security matters, and the latter relied on Evdokimov's former colleagues to carry out the mass killing operations that are known as the Great Terror in 1937–38.

On 13 January 2010, Kiev Appellate Court posthumously found Stalin, Kaganovich and other Soviet Communist Party functionaries guilty of genocide against Ukrainians during the Holodomor famine.
Wikipedia is the source of the quote; your sources are…?
进行 ...
"Humor is emotional chaos remembered in tranquility." - James Thurber
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts!" - Richard Feynman
 (iBook G4 - Panther | Mac mini i5 - El Capitan)

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #130
Neither are we considered nor are we treated as allies (f*ck the EU).
We are vassals. From your point of view it's an existential vassalage...
By my point of view it's just simple pragmatism. Do you have any alternative? no, you don't.
Decades and decades of pacifism turned Europe into a defenseless sheep. Between the bad and the worst, Nato is the only guarantee against Putin.
A matter of attitude.

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #131
As for the Ukraine it is in a worse shape it ever was.
You're young; Howie's old. Neither of you know much of history…
Since you seem to be a Wikipedia-expert in European history, lemme tell you something.
Neither did I mean the Ukraine during the Neolithic nor during the centuries after.
We can hardly speak of an Ukrainian state during those times. I meant the Ukraine as an independent state since 1991.

 

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #132
Neither are we considered nor are we treated as allies (f*ck the EU).
We are vassals. From your point of view it's an existential vassalage...
By my point of view it's just simple pragmatism. Do you have any alternative? no, you don't.
Decades and decades of pacifism turned Europe into a defenseless sheep. Between the bad and the worst, Nato is the only guarantee against Putin.
The reasoning for your 'pragmatism' is well-known to me. :)
Instead of an European army decoupled from NATO/USA you prefer European vassalage. USA = bad, Germany = worse - while the rest of Europe doesn't seem to matter in your equation.
No need to exert Putin therefore. Chances that an asteroid could flatten Portugal are higher than a Russian invasion. :D

As for decades and decades of European pacifism you deplore, may I remind you that Europeans were/are unfortunately present in several conflicts/wars as vassals (Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria - to name just a few).
BTW, any wars you'd suggest for Europe to start? Eventually under Portuguese commandership? :left:

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #133
OakdaleFTL is a regular Yank so he has to trace history so nothing outstanding from him! The attitude of NATO and it's secretary is like something out of a comic book rather than anything serious or in depth. Indeed the anti-Russian rhetoric is like Dr Goebells stuff. The media and politicians join the hype and neo-fanaticism about Russia and President Putin. Kind of laughable being led by a country that needs hundreds of bases across the world for "protection - uh?

The thing was really set up as a an anti-Warsaw Pact thing bu then the USSR and that corner collapsed  instead of common sense the usual imperial nonsense had to presume. Any place that does not give in to the West and especially the US leadership and corporate sector is going to be badly done to. NATO is a control freak a big expense and is not necessary at all. Instead of moaning about the members who do not pay enough in and leave it to the  glory hunting US of A the thing should be got rid of and just think of the poor in certain places that could bring benefit to!
"Quit you like men:be strong"

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #134
Listening to Howie, it's easy to understand how England lost her empire… :)
He should, however (as so should all others…) be glad that the U.S. is, by the nature of its governmental structure, incompetent at empire. (I, for one, wish it to remain so! No republic ever maintained an empire. Such empirical evidence is not to be discounted.)
进行 ...
"Humor is emotional chaos remembered in tranquility." - James Thurber
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts!" - Richard Feynman
 (iBook G4 - Panther | Mac mini i5 - El Capitan)


Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #136
Oakdale doesn't know what an empire looks like. Such as the nominally republican Roman state or nominally federal Soviet state. Or the de facto colonial United States. No wonder he also doesn't know what democracy looks like and what the historical examples are.

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #137
Instead of an European army decoupled from NATO/USA you prefer European vassalage. USA = bad, Germany = worse - while the rest of Europe doesn't seem to matter in your equation.
European army? don't make me laugh.

You are the one desiring vassalage, vassalage to a well done, perfect, KGB strategy:

Phase 1 - During the Soviet regime - explore all the horrors created by Germany during Nazism and WWII to massively finance pacifism in Europe. Result is done, absolutely no capacity to defense.
Phase 2 - After the Soviets - massive finance into  all the"Russia Today" and the kind to make Europe to reject and insult the only help it can get. No American public opinion will ever accept to send their children again to die for rjhowies and krakes.
Phase 3 - After NATO disintegration, the final move - annexation.
The End.

Bunch of imbeciles. Keep that way and we'll be forced to adress each others by Comrades.
A matter of attitude.

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #138
Typical rubbish on history from Oakdale about no republic having an empire. France immediately rubbishes that. America had a financial and corporate empire and couldn't care a damn about places they de-stabilised or attacked as the control would be through the corporate controllers.

As for a European Army we were against that rubbish anyway and is another laughable nonsense. After all the US controllers of NATO have had to moan for ages with countries not paying their share and ignoring the 2% line.NATO is a hangover from the past and being used for corporate control as much as anything else.
"Quit you like men:be strong"

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #139
Bunch of imbeciles. Keep that way and we'll be forced to adress each others by Comrades.
Don't worry. Krakes won't address you with "Kamerad". Sometimes we prefer the "Arschloch" term.

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #140
 :o
进行 ...
"Humor is emotional chaos remembered in tranquility." - James Thurber
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts!" - Richard Feynman
 (iBook G4 - Panther | Mac mini i5 - El Capitan)

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #141
Russia is not a damn threat Belfrager. It is the stuff conjured up by the USA and brained into the rest of the West helped by media fanaticism. It gives an excuse to continue with NATO and the corporate military industry. It frustrates the would-vbe leader of the free world that there is a place it cannot control or control it's business, etc. Indeed it is also frustrated because it cannot control the present situation either hence all the military build up guff we are getting.
"Quit you like men:be strong"

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #142
As I've said before, RJ is a modern OrangeMan: A mixture of Red and Yellow… :)
进行 ...
"Humor is emotional chaos remembered in tranquility." - James Thurber
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts!" - Richard Feynman
 (iBook G4 - Panther | Mac mini i5 - El Capitan)

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #143
(Groan) One has to put up with redneck ignorance as a fact of life. The two colours of the brotherhood are orange and purple!

When it comes to associating colours dear man use white for ex-colonists as they have given into surrendering to their ultra-nationalism and and controlled (not by democracy of course!).  :hat:
"Quit you like men:be strong"

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #144
On a more general note I dare say that if it rained too hard the Russians would get the blame for that. Just a day or two ago Amnesty International stated that the US led coalition re Syria had killed 400 civilians but they don't count as they weren't done in by Russia.  In another recent "bombing incident" where a school was partly hit the White House blamed it on the Russians/Syrian Government but there was something very odd about the pictures.  From above NO CRATERS or anything lie them. Filming showed that it was more likely a shelling from ground level. Russia asked for an independent enquiry but silence.  When America was queried about their raids the White House came out with stuff that they were very technical and didn't kill civilians! Eh?  When you consider the killings in a very regular fashion of Afghanistanis including repeated weddings makes you wonder. So one sie has plane bombs but don't kill civilians?

Now here is another thing. How come there is no general news reporting on the rebels in east Aleppo who regularly shell the west of the city and kill civilians and damages schools, etc? it is high time NATO was scrapped and the money spent on something more constructive than creating stupid propaganda to keep imperial and corporate minds in power.
"Quit you like men:be strong"


Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #146
Cobblers.

You like so many the brain soaked people swallow nonsense. Russia has stated it has no military intentions in eastern Europe at all but that does not suit the America led West poodle lot including your place. Even in the UN the country has been voted off the admin on aid yet a damn place like the Saudi Arabia dung pit is as democratic as the old USSR, Nazi Germany or the long days of Portuguese dictatorship. Saudi Arabia is principled, eh? The examples of bias stuff about Syria is pathetic and the routine examples of the two-faced stuff from the West. Apart from my info you ignored the BBC reported tonight that an ISIS attempt is being made to break the government siege of east Aleppo and who was fighting with them? The "moderates" the West supplies!

You like so many have been fooled by the West propagandist and media which in turn is string pulled by politicians and who leads this junk to follow but the corporate and imperialistic West leader which does not like having anywhere it cannot control of get it's corporate bosses to influence. You are being dumbed by the Yanks and the controlled media there and across the West. Keeping NATO afloat all sorts of conjured up propaganda is cobbled up because the West cannot bludgeon Russia into it's submission control like elsewhere. it is a wonder you and others do not have a picture of the clever Dr Goebells on the wall.  :hat:
"Quit you like men:be strong"

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #147
RJ, you might like Fred Reed's latest screed… :)
进行 ...
"Humor is emotional chaos remembered in tranquility." - James Thurber
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts!" - Richard Feynman
 (iBook G4 - Panther | Mac mini i5 - El Capitan)

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #148
@OakdaleFTL

I don't know Fred Reed and what he stands for.
However, I was surprised about his frankness for using two terms: "Empire" and "Vassals".

Re: NATO nonsense

Reply #149
Fred Reed, in his public life, was first an American Marine; an admirable position. Then he was a journalist — for Soldier of Fortune magazine… He stayed in south-east Asia beyond his "sell-by" date. :) He is a self-described "curmudgeon".
He's also -in my opinion- a straight shooter.
You folks without the benefit of the U.S. Second Amendment don't really appreciate that locution… :)
进行 ...
"Humor is emotional chaos remembered in tranquility." - James Thurber
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts!" - Richard Feynman
 (iBook G4 - Panther | Mac mini i5 - El Capitan)