Skip to main content
Recent Posts
1
Hobbies & Entertainment / Re: Films and Books
Last post by Frenzie -
In principle destructive scanning can be a perfectly normal part of mass digitization. But those internal planning documents do make it sound like they're not taking any of the typical precautions, since otherwise they could just say they only do it to mass market paperbacks while non-destructively scanning or otherwise processing rare books.

There's even a well-known big tech analog that already works that way: Google Books.

Turns out, Google created some seriously nifty infrared camera technology that detects the three-dimensional shape and angle of book pages when the book is placed in the scanner. This information is transmitted to the OCR software, which adjusts for the distortions and allows the OCR software to read text more accurately. No more broken bindings, no more inefficient glass plates. Google has finally figured out a way to digitize books en masse. For all those who've pondered "How'd They Do That?" you finally have an answer.

It's also incredibly hypocritical that Anthropic dares complain about other people training a bit on output from their model. They're one gigantic distillation operation themselves.
We should crack down on industrial-scale distillation operations.
2
Hobbies & Entertainment / Re: Films and Books
Last post by ersi -
AI Companies Destroying Books For Training
AI companies are purchasing physical books in bulk, including rare and out-of-print titles, then using high-speed machines to cut the spines and scan the pages before disposing of the originals, according to court documents and industry reports.

Court filings unsealed in connection with a copyright lawsuit against Anthropic detailed Project Panama, which began in early 2024.

An internal planning document stated that “Project Panama is our effort to destructively scan all the books in the world.” The same document added that “We use a ‘soft codename’ for it because we don’t want it to be known that we are working on this. This document is visible to all Anthropic employees, but you should avoid talking about it in public areas, and the fact that we are working on this should not be shared with anyone outside Anthropic.”

In a June 2025 ruling in Bartz v. Anthropic, U.S. District Judge William Alsup of the Northern District of California held that digitizing legally purchased print books and using the resulting digital copies to train large language models was fair use. The judge noted that the process replaced the print copies with digital versions without adding new copies or redistributing them. Anthropic later settled related claims involving pirated digital books for $1.5 billion.
The implosion of the AI bubble should arrive soon. AI deserves to crash and burn.
3
DnD Central / Re: The Awesomesauce of the American 2024 Presidential Elections
Last post by ersi -
Trump was joking too, at first.

But yeah, Romney does not go all-in into his jokes and this makes him an unlikely candidate. And he is an establishment guy and actually competent both in office and in business, none of which is in vogue anymore. Trump set the new standard: Openly corrupt, incompetent, criminal, lying, and warmongering. Romney does not qualify.

I was very wrong in my prediction of Donald Trump's (second) chances. Now I think times have genuinely changed in favour of populists, liars, lawbreakers and totalitarians, both in politics and in business. A decent guy may win elections accidentally (even if the elections are rigged, which they increasingly will be), but when in office it is mandatory to become a corrupt hysterical lunatic or lose the post in short order. Romney does not have the requisite temperament. I remember that he tried to smuggle himself into Trump's administration both the first and second time, but was rejected both times because he is just not enough of a scum sleazebag — no sex scandals, no open racism and selfish thievery, therefore worthless.