It's unimportant and even irrelevant if it brings money or not if you, say, discuss some basic techniques or like that. The basics are the same - you saw the OP (didn't you?).
A user can report a post, but a user can't report a post's absence. But in this case I am reporting it right here right now. If somebody's unable to discuss any other "way" than deleting questions etc., ***** and that person should not show up before my eyes ever any more. Full stop.
Well, I guess we can consider 1) pure stunts, 2) stunt+cut, let alone special effects added when it's due. I'm not keeping in mind what went on in "Hazards", though I guess we'd throw it to the 2nd category, ?
Dude, I wasn't even thinking about explosions, it seems you just misunderstood the talking. Explosions are not stunts anyway. I'm not sure - perhaps you'd call them special effects? Time to time I come across a separate line in a movie's "tombstone" designated "explosions":lol: "Stunts" are "Stunts" - separately.
A propos, in the light of IT progress and such, should we say goodbye to aero-stunts? It seems much simpler to just draw everything on a computer. I think there's a sort of scenes which is just unachieveable by performing some real stunts - for example in SciFi, especially with space ships or any sort of unexisting devices. But - planes? What if they'll manage to go without real cars in terrestrial settings soon too?
Sorry and thanks. I've just edited that. I seem to be more accustomed to the MUSICAL "variant" of the spelling than to the auto/motor or even biological one.
Well, Frans, if you want examples, it's not my favourite, but the saga about those "Fast & Furious" guys seems to have simply been created for showing off with auto/motor stunts, don't you think? Although they don't seem EXACTLY Hollywoodian to me: they are of the track or highway sort, it seems -- high class - but (Bel!) sorta realistic. While the "pavement" sort.. I don't think a normal chaser, or chased, could get away with such stuff. In real life, I mean. Huh?