Where debating everything under the sun is only the beginning

An attack on Iran? Why would we (or you) possibly want to attack Iran?

No jimbro the thrust is correct so don't hide behind the English stuff!

Wonderful teacher with such language so look in the mirror before you descend the plateau you think you are on. Add the hypocrisy word after much of what you dug at your sudden Southern gentleman previously. It is hardly very clever to suddenly adopt a previous person you hit on due to some incapability. Small wonder your national government is concerned about education you and him display it well here. As for education not being a negative thing you too have been too full of yourselves as it has had that negative effect on you both. The rest of the world is in more practical vibes not self analysed grabbed high ground.

snip
Do you have anything nice to say?

Quote from: tt92 on 2014-03-14, 08:57:42

Quote from: Jimbro3738 on 2014-03-14, 08:01:54

Quote from: tt92 on 2014-03-13, 21:31:58

Quote from: rjhowie on 2014-03-13, 21:16:32

People who think they are something and accuse others of being beyond the pale or do gibberish always fail to recognise their own weakness.

Welcome aboard.
you have described yourself perfectly.

Do I detect a smidgen of sarcasm, sir?

No

Will you please expand on that?

Quote from: tt92 on 2014-03-13, 21:31:58

Quote from: rjhowie on 2014-03-13, 21:16:32

People who think they are something and accuse others of being beyond the pale or do gibberish always fail to recognise their own weakness.

Welcome aboard.
you have described yourself perfectly.

Do I detect a smidgen of sarcasm, sir?

As I surmised before I transferred here that this would become a carbon copy f Opera. Namely the same wee club of self-righteous, smug and know-it-alls. That Macallan is as before adds to that and a Mod?? Head saking and ridiculous. People who think they are something and accuse others of being beyond the pale or do gibberish always fail to recognise their own weakness.

Quote from: tt92 on 2014-03-12, 22:53:05

You are on shaky ground as one poster whose first language in not English criticising the English of another poster whose first language is not English.

You're calling rjhowie's gibberish 'English'?

Quote from: rjhowie on 2014-03-13, 03:17:14

Well there are awful big chink of Islam that fits into the kafir mentality thinking right across the world and a reign of violence abounds. And anyway something more basic - the whole idea of the founder of Islam being a prophet of God which I find a negative. Why would God start a religion with a child molestor? The interpretation of this conundrum will be interesting.

Joseph, Mary's husband, was "90 years old" when he married 12 to 14-year old Mary!Was he too a pedophile?
They lived longer age them
i could quote more
When we read the Bible, we learn about some Prophets marrying many wives, even hundreds of wives in some cases. Let us look at some of the verses from the Old Testament:

In Exodus 21:10, a man can marry an infinite amount of women without any limits to how many he can marry.

In 2 Samuel 5:13; 1 Chronicles 3:1-9, 14:3, King David had six wives and numerous concubines.

In 1 Kings 11:3, King Solomon had 700 wives and 300 concubines.

In 2 Chronicles 11:21, King Solomon's son Rehoboam had 18 wives and 60 concubines.

And knowing that the Bible's Old Testament allowed before for men to have sex with girls who were at the age of 3, then it wouldn't surprise me that those Prophets who had 700 wives for instance, had many very young "teenage" girls before as their wives.

It wouldn't surprise me if they too had wives that were younger than Mary when she got pregnant, and younger than Aisha when she got married.

Since there are so many wives that those Prophets married (hundreds of wives), then how would anyone know that they didn't marry young women as our beloved Prophet peace be upon him did with his marriage to Aisha peace be upon her?