I'm correcting the tagging work performed this idiotic computer system. Mostly it's mind numbing, but this one mistake made me laugh. Column 1 is the original, column 2 is the same preprocessed by the system for internal purposes, column 3 is the Modern Dutch lemma, and column 4 is the tag.
Dit dit dit Pron(dem)
vloyen vloyen vloeien N(sing)
Gods gods god N(prop,forms)
cyscht cyscht eisen V(fin,pres,lex,formt)
altoes altoes altoos Adv(gener)
een een een Art(indef)
wedervloyen wedervloyen wedervloeien N(sing)
; ; ; Punc(semicolon)
want want want Conj(subord)
God god god N(prop)
is is zijn V(fin,pres,aux_cop)
ene ene een Art(indef,forme)
vloyende vloyende ellende N(sing,forme)
ende ende en Conj(coord)
ebbende ebbende hebben V(participle,pres,forme)
zee zee zij Pron(pers,3,plu)
This flowing (of) God's demands always a wither-flowing, because God is a flowing and ebbing sea.
But the silly computer interpreted it as:
This (of) God's demands always a , because God is a misery.
As Wil Wheaton says, life is more fun when you're easily amused.
(But unfortunately, most mistakes are just annoying.)