Skip to main content
Topic: Earth 2.0? (Read 20054 times)

Re: Earth 2.0?

Reply #75
Scotland's first satellite---- maybe it's part of the engine for the Enterprise. Get the parts up there, then build the starship. Saves time waiting for parts once construction starts.
What would happen if a large asteroid slammed into the Earth?
According to several tests involving a watermelon and a large hammer, it would be really bad!

Re: Earth 2.0?

Reply #76
No there is not enough being spent here on Earth and the tragedies of many places bears that one out. As for space exploration and that in the next 100 years we will have problems here means zilch. There is nowhere else for them to go.
"Quit you like men:be strong"

Re: Earth 2.0?

Reply #77
We sent our first satellite more than 10 years ago, the Posat. No one knows what for or what happened to it meanwhile.
But I remember the responsible "scientist" for that, he looked exactly as Pavarotti. No one has ever listened about him since then.
I'm glad Germans the EU must have payed for such imbecility.

Well, satellites are not too much expensive these days. The price of wine it's much worst thanks to Northerner barbarians drinking it as a luxury.
A matter of attitude.

 

Re: Earth 2.0?

Reply #78
But throw in the cost of ambitious things like wanting to go to Mars and more exploration into nothingness which is drearily pointless.
"Quit you like men:be strong"