Where debating everything under the sun is only the beginning

Still proving you are one of the mental midgets there Sanguinemoon. You cannot answer my statement on children being killed and on top of that only use my regular quote (land of nut jobs - maybe I should acknowledge my thanks) about all you trigger happy nutters using the 18th and early `19th century as an excuse to kill them and the thousands of adults. What a terribly violent nation and doesn't get any better. So now the whole world knows that the killing of lots of kids is okay in the violent ex-colonies which hypocritically tries to show itself as a wonder to the world. Yeah it is as a gunslinger's paradise. Disgusting. 

Gotta question: Who is " all you trigger happy nutters"? You were responding to Sanguinemoon, and-- "trigger happy" isn't something likely to be said about him any time soon. Or haven't you noticed. Oh, wait, that's right. ALL of us here in the ex-colonies are trigger happy nutters. Gotcha.

You cannot answer my statement on children being killed and on top of that only use my regular quote (land of nut jobs - maybe I should acknowledge my thanks)

It's all part & parcel of RJ's Anti-American Dancing Haggis Show ...... if it fits his perverted needs, it's in. 

What or who is a neo-con?

I do understand that neo-con braindeaders have to have things as simple as possible.

301]
.......... perverted dreams of dancing haggis .......

 

.........Mental health is the ugly kid sister in the health care debate that gets ignored by all but the most passionate policymakers, many of whom have personal experience with mental disabilities. Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, protested on the Senate floor Thursday that Republicans and Democrats were fighting over the wrong issue. The issue isn’t the guns, he said. It’s mental health. “Let’s make sure that guns aren’t getting into the hands of people we all agree shouldn’t have them.”

The legal connection between gun buying and mental health is uneven and unfair. There is no single definition of an “adjudicated” mental-health problem that bars a person from buying a gun, and they can vary from court to court and case to case. Many states don’t report mental-health cases to the feds for fear of violating privacy laws or because they lack the resources. Mental-health advocates fear that widening the gun-owning restrictions on people with mental-health problems will deter people such as veterans or police officers from seeking treatment. Once they are in treatment, what reassurances do they have that they won’t be banned from owning a gun?

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., a pro-gun Republican, sponsors legislation that would require states to report adjudicated mental-health cases to the national database of people barred from gun purchases, clearing up some privacy questions. But Graham’s bill also would give people on that list a chance to prove they are rehabilitated or that they aren’t a threat to themselves or society.

Gun-control advocates hate this bill because they say it would make it easier for people with mental-health problems to buy guns. Graham says he’s only trying to be fair. “We’re trying to make sure that seeking treatment—you know, we all go through tough times—does not deny you your Second Amendment rights. So we’re doing a balance here,” he said...........continued

 

I want this post to serve as an oasis of sanity in Ex-Colonists's desert of foolishness. Let's get down to business: Ex-Colonists says that the purpose of life is self-gratification. Whenever I hear such statements from Ex-Colonists I reel in disbelief. Does it really believe such deluded things? It's questions like that that honestly get people thinking about how I am not a robot. I am a thinking, feeling, human being. As such, I get teary-eyed whenever I see Ex-Colonists force me to undergo “treatment” to cure my “problem”. It makes me want to evaluate the tactics it has used against me, which is why I'm so eager to tell you that I recommend paying close attention to the praxeological method developed by the economist Ludwig von Mises and using it as a technique to cast a gimlet eye on Ex-Colonists's escapades. The praxeological method is useful in this context because it employs praxeology, the general science of human action, to explain why Ex-Colonists will understate the negative impact of antiheroism one of these days. When that event happens, a darkness and evil exceeding anything seen in history will descend over the world. I can hope only that before it does, people will raise the quality of debate on issues surrounding Ex-Colonists's sanctimonious causeries. Only then can we admonish Ex-Colonists not seven times, but seventy times seven.

For years I've been warning people that Ex-Colonists plans to condemn children to a life of drugs, gangs, drinking, rape, incest, verbal abuse, physical abuse, and a number of other horrors. However, that's not my entire message; it's only a part of it. I also want you to know that those of us who are still sane, those of us who still have a firm grip on reality, those of us who still assert that we must stand united as free, sovereign individuals and focus on the major economic, social, and political forces that provide the setting for the expression of an annoying agenda, have an obligation to do more than just observe what Ex-Colonists is doing from a safe distance. We have an obligation to fight scurrility and slander. We have an obligation to create a world in which zabernism, totalism, and pessimism are all but forgotten. And we have an obligation to challenge its claims of exceptionalism. If Ex-Colonists had lived the short, sickly, miserable life of a chattel serf in the ages “before technocracy” it wouldn't be so keen to dispense outright misinformation and flashlight-under-the-chin ghost stories. Maybe it'd even begin to realize that its votaries argue that it can change its ill-bred ways. These are the same avaricious, overweening nutty-types who burn its castigators at the stake. This is no coincidence; if you think that this is humorous or exaggerated, you're wrong.

....... Liberals are not about doing, they are about posturing. Liberals love to perform for the camera as a way to play naïve, ill-informed, misguided Americans like fiddles. They are masters at publically wringing their hands and crying crocodile tears every time another nutcase uses a gun to act out his psychological disorders. But ask them to stop talking and do something—something like enforcing the myriad gun laws already on the books and they are stunned into silence. If liberals were really concerned about gun violence, they would demand that the Justice Department do its job and prosecute the gun-related cases recommended to it by law enforcement agencies. Don’t count on this happening. Under the current Justice Department a violent criminal has a better chance of winning the lottery than being prosecuted by Attorney General Holder, et.al ..............continued

gobbley-gook from tt92. Being of a red neck mentality