Skip to main content
Topic: Putin the Magnificent: Series 2 - Putin's Russia (Read 96215 times)

Re: Putin the Magnificent: Series 2 - Putin's Russia

Reply #150

A drive-by shooting done by a Chicago street-gang? Sorry, Chicago gangs aren't that good. They're good at killing all right, but hitting their intended target and no one else in a drive by? Nope, they're not that good. This was a high-level assassination, done by professionals.


One should read with some sane scepticism all the BS floating around.
Whoever did it, the target wasn't hit in a drive by. The killer was walking a few meters behind the victim.

Re: Putin the Magnificent: Series 2 - Putin's Russia

Reply #151
Are Rjhowie and Krake already defending that Putin has the right to kill opposition?
No? bah... when they start defending it, I'll post something :)
A matter of attitude.

Re: Putin the Magnificent: Series 2 - Putin's Russia

Reply #152
I get it, all too clear. Something "happens" to the most likely man to replace Putin in the next vote, he gets offed--- Putin or his goons are the most likely source of the outrage. This will never do of course, so RJHowie sides with his hero to try to save the day.

Boris Nemtsov Exposed Putin's Corruption—And Paid With His Life
The author knew Nemtsov personally. While he doesn't offer direct evidence, there are insights into the rampant corruption within the Kremlin.

Quote
The last time I saw Boris Nemtsov, in Tallinn, Estonia in 2013, he had wanted to find a way to tack on more Putin regime officials to a U.S. law that would ban them from entering the country or freeze whatever assets they held here. The former first deputy prime minister of Russia, who was brutally shot to death within eyeshot of the Kremlin this evening, had many enemies, not least of them the president of Russia. He was handsome, charismatic and popular in the West and in Eastern Europe. “First we liberate Belarus, and then Russia!” former Belarusian presidential candidate, dissident and Lukashenko torture victim Andrei Sannikov told him on that same occasion. Nemtsov joyfully agreed. On Sunday he had planned to lead a march against Vladimir Putin’s unacknowledged dirty war in Ukraine


.....

Quote
Two years ago, Nemtsov and his colleague Leonid Martynyuk released a report titled, “Winter Olympics in the Sub-Tropics: Corruption and Abuse in Sochi,” which alleged that Putin had personally overseen the enormous, profligate project and was therefore responsible for the estimated $26 billion frittered away in “embezzlement and kickbacks.” They named names. 


The names are Oleg Deripaska, Vladimir Potanin. Hrm, I wonder why  Putin's friends Boris and Arkady Rotenberg got 15 percent of the money  controlled by Olimpstroy, the state company created to finance the Olympics.

Just in the Olympics, Putin's pals ran off with billions but it corruption wasn't just in Sochi. (why have the winter olympics there? Might as well hold them in Las Vegas. We have mountains with snow and from work there's a nice view them. Just like with Sochi, the snow isn't reliable enough for Olympic games  just like in sub-tropical Russia....)

In 2012, the New York Times noted that  corruption is “Russia’s own special way.”  In the same year BBC Business noted that the Russian economy is underperforming and falling well short of it's potential owing to the massive scale of corruption.

Nemtsov's death was another case of a true patriot being gunned down by the cronies in the capital. He wanted to clean up the system, but was murdered because doing so would hurt Putin and his pals bank accounts.

Re: Putin the Magnificent: Series 2 - Putin's Russia

Reply #153
@Belfrager
Do you know who is behind that crime or are you only playing the jester? One jester more won't make any difference anyway.
Whatever, feel free to post anything, the usual rubbish inclusive. Nobody here will be shocked.

Re: Putin the Magnificent: Series 2 - Putin's Russia

Reply #154
@Sanguinemoon
Instead of proudly presenting allegations and insinuations collected from your media, you could at least for a moment meditate about the country that is perceived by most people worldwide as the biggest threat for world peace.
Just a hint - it isn't 'Putin's' Russia, neither North Korea nor Iran.

Re: Putin the Magnificent: Series 2 - Putin's Russia

Reply #155
Germany?


Re: Putin the Magnificent: Series 2 - Putin's Russia

Reply #157
Germany?

Before this is over, it will be Ukraine itself at least in state controlled Russian media.

@Krake.  Putin's supporters could give one a try. It's the free and independent media that's critical of the Putin regime's actions. State-controlled media from Russia offers apologetics and denies to what the rest of the world finds blindingly obvious.

Re: Putin the Magnificent: Series 2 - Putin's Russia

Reply #158

Germany?

Before this is over, it will be Ukraine itself at least in state controlled Russian media.


Or Tuvalu - in case someone would still take you seriously.


@Krake. State-controlled media from Russia offers apologetics and denies to what the rest of the world finds blindingly obvious.


"Blindingly obvious" you say?

Whatever US media and that of its vassals consider to be blindingly obvious, don't mix it up with "the rest of the world".
The latter represents namely more than the former.

Speaking about crimes, it was also obvious for Western media that protesters on the maidan were shot by Yanukovych's order.
Kiev doesn't seem to have any interest to find and prosecute the killers. Neither does the West care anymore who they were.
One might wonder why? The idea that they were Yanukovych's men fits perfectly. Who cares if the pretended obvious gets mixed up with the truth as long as it serves the agenda.
The fact that many traces lead to the Right Sector are simply ignored and the truth gets replaced step by step, by the pretended obvious.


Re: Putin the Magnificent: Series 2 - Putin's Russia

Reply #160
Free and independent media? Ha ha, brilliant Sanguinemoon. The media is part of the corporate control hands which you choose to ignore because it does not suit. So any nation that does not kow-tow to the ex-colonies nut job leadership is in for a hard time. A country that needs over 400 bases and thinks the world needs it to influence and control is a far more dangerous corner than Russia. Jimbro for all his education is slumping into the same corner as the controlled mindsets. Russia was an enemeny as he grew up and the same for many over there. When the USSR went America thought that there would be a new era and the size of the country could offer great commercial interests and influence. However Russia had no intention of being sucked into the coroorate baron controllers.

That any politician is killed is wrong yet at the same time the West led by America sticks it's mouth into something that is none of it's business and all the hype about a politician who got 1% of Russian support. The way the media goes you would think it was 50% or like near Putin's level but nope. At the funeral the organisers refused other Russian opposition leaders to go and from Europe but that is sidelined as doesn't suit the brain controllers of the West. There has been since the collapse of the USSR regime a gradual move into a more capitalist direction by Russia but if you listened to some of the dumbness here in this forum you would shake your head at their stupidity.

I really and definitely would like them to fid the killer and those behind him with factual evidence not the utter and stupid mouthings going on here without any proof. It doesn't matter what hardships we in the West put on the bear it wll remain independent, proud and loyal so get used to it and try using a bit of patience instead of just sucummbing to the immediacy of being automatically bias. Kind of laughable that i get accused when it is widely practiced here and especially on Russia.
"Quit you like men:be strong"

Re: Putin the Magnificent: Series 2 - Putin's Russia

Reply #161
The media is part of the corporate control hands which you choose to ignore because it does not suit

And the non-corporate. And just because the outlet is one doesn't make what it says wrong. The converse is obviously true as well, a blogger can pass on misinformation and outright fabrications. I don't think it takes a genius to understand this. Meanwhile outfits like your RT are financed by the Russian government and is a propaganda arm of it.

Who cares about he placed in the election. He indeed had powerful enemies and from the sound of was on the brink revealing embarrassing information. Think of it this way. In 1972 Nixon won by a landslide. George McGovern only won in Massachusetts and Washington DC. What happened to  Tricky Dick?

Nemtsov was not the first in a string of Putin critics to be murdered. Only the latest one.

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2015/03/04/crossing-kremlin-nemtsov-latest-in-long-line-putin-critics-to-wind-up-dead/

Quote
Enemies of Vladimir Putin have a way of winding up dead.

Whether they are poisoned, gunned down on the streets of Moscow or blown to bits in their homes, people who have crossed or merely criticized the Russian president have turned up dead around the world. Putin political adversary Boris Nemtsov, who was shot and killed near the Kremlin last week, is only the latest in a long line that includes hundreds of journalists, human rights activists and businessmen.


Hundreds of Putin critics, Howie and Krake. Coincidence? Or will you blame the messenger, which all the independent media in the fucking world.

Quote
Among the more notable cases:

Sergei Yushenkov was gunned down in front of his home in April 2003. Yushenkov was part of a commission that investigated claims the KGB orchestrated bombings to ignite support for Putin’s war against Chechnya. A second member of the commission was fatally poisoned, a third nearly lost his life after being severely beaten, and the attorney for the commission was imprisoned for espionage.
Forbes editor Paul Klebnikov was shot to death in Moscow in July 2004, after he reportedly uncovered a money-laundering scheme that reached the highest levels of the Kremlin. Two suspects were charged, but later acquitted. He was one of more than 300 journalists in Russia who have disappeared or been murdered since 1993, according to a June 2009 report from the International Federation of Journalists.
In June 2004, human rights advocate and professor Nikolai Girenko was assassinated in his home.
Andrei Kozlov, a top official at Russia’s Central Bank who dedicated his career to eliminating money laundering, was killed in September 2006.
Anna Politkovskaya, who wrote books and articles accusing Putin of human rights violations in Chechnya, was executed in an elevator in her Moscow apartment building on Oct. 7, 2006.
Human rights attorney Stanislav Markelov was shot in the head in January 2009, as he left a press conference where he announced plans to sue the Russian government. Journalism student Anastasia Barburova was killed as she tried to intervene.
Human rights journalist Natalia Estemirova, was killed in July 2009, after being kidnapped from her home in Chechnya.
Two well-known cases of the poisoning of Putin adversaries involved former Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko and former KGB agent Alexander Litvinenko.

The world saw the effects of dioxin poisoning on the face of Yuschenko in 2004, when he was running for the office he held until 2010. The poisoning followed an assassination attempt, and although no one was ever charged, suspicion focused on the Kremlin which, in a twist that foreshadowed by a decade the current tension between Moscow and Kiev, may have feared Yuschenko would take Ukraine toward better relations with western Europe.

Litvinenko, who authored the Kremlin expose “Blowing up Russia,” and was living under asylum in Great Britain, was given a fatal dose of Polonium in November 2006. The main suspect is reportedly former KGB agent and Putin crony Andrey Lugovoy, who has since been elected to Russia’s Duman, putting him out of reach of extradition laws.


....

Quote
“Putin gets away with it because the Russian state controls the media in Russia, it rules with an iron fist, and Russians are deeply afraid of their own government,” said Nile Gardiner, of the Heritage Foundation. “Putin sits atop a vicious tyranny. Ordinary Russians won’t stand up to the state. There is a climate of fear with the Putin regime exercising a vise-like grip over the Russian people.”








Re: Putin the Magnificent: Series 2 - Putin's Russia

Reply #162
What answer do you two have that criticising Putin seems to increase your risk of dying young? I'm not interested in criticisms of the media, general America bashing and other bullshit. I want to know why this isn't true.


Re: Putin the Magnificent: Series 2 - Putin's Russia

Reply #163
From the Moscow Times: 62 Years On, Some Still Mourn for Josef Stalin.
From Jimbro: Some Republicans still Love Newt Gingrich.


Re: Putin the Magnificent: Series 2 - Putin's Russia

Reply #164
I wonder if Krake and Howie know that Putin himself calls Nemtsov's murder political , or at least has political subtext.


Quote
"The most serious attention should be paid to high-profile crimes, including the ones with a political subtext. Russia should be devoid at last of the kind of shame and tragedies that we have recently endured and seen," he said in a speech during a meeting with officials from the interior ministry.

"I mean the murder, the audacious murder of Boris Nemtsov right in the centre of the capital," he said.


Oh, and the car involved in Nemtsov's murder was owned by a state enterprise which provides security to government institutions. Just because the murder came from within the Kremlin doesn't mean Putin himself ordered it, which doesn't contradict that Vlad's enemies do have this bad habit of dying. Buried within the Kremlin the old black heart of the Soviet Union still beats from time to time. For Russia's sake, and for that of the rest of the world, the USSR's zombie needs to be put to rest. What this means in practical terms is to rid the Kremlin of men who picked up this habit of dispensing of their enemies in this fashion and pine for the old Soviet dictatorship. If they truly love their country, they need to retire.

Re: Putin the Magnificent: Series 2 - Putin's Russia

Reply #165
Buried within the Kremlin the old black heart of the Soviet Union still beats from time to time.

From The Moscow Times...
Quote
In the Carnegie poll last year, 42 percent of Russian respondents named Stalin as the most influential historical figure.

"Vladimir Putin's Russia of 2012 needs symbols of authority and national strength, however controversial they may be, to validate the newly authoritarian political order," Gudkov wrote in the Carnegie report. "Stalin, a despotic leader responsible for mass bloodshed but also still identified with wartime victory and national unity, fits this need for symbols that reinforce the current political ideology."

Re: Putin the Magnificent: Series 2 - Putin's Russia

Reply #166
Just think - Stalin with a bigger poll rating that the President of the half democracy the US of A!

Sanguinemoon, when it comes to dishing out would-be principles and guff about democracy, rights, freedoms remember this.

Right through  a big chunk of the 20th century your land was corrupt as Hell.Judges, police departments, politicians from governors to senators and congressmen in the pay of gangland and the Mafia. Even the Kennedy money came from crime. Hundreds of thousands in the KKK and again politicians, police and heaven knows who in with them. Towns run by corrupters and all in the land of so-called greatness. One State has had 4 governors in jail and there have been others. Even  President dumped for illegality.

Many of those in Russia are older people and they tend to be more used to a rigour and order they were trained in. Indeed i have watched occasionally ex-SS men interviewed who miss what they once had in Germany. So don't you come out with this rubbish as if you have a clean base to start with. The US thinks it has a right to control the world have military everywhere followed by corporate money people and some God-given right. Russia will not buckle to these stupid sanctions because it is a country with a long nationalism and conservative tradition. You like many have been gullible due to the corporate media coming out with ridiculous things and the politicians are also part of the braining.

For the younger Russians and a growin middle-class there are shops full, modern facilities the right to own business or a home (illegal in the USSR) and when you look back at the USSR and pictures of the cities they are boring and they have changed. Cities so full of cars now there are regular traffic jams, wider choices, modernity. Look how long your country has been working to try and be a democracy and it still has failed. So you have no damn right to shout rubbish about somewhere else.

"Quit you like men:be strong"


Re: Putin the Magnificent: Series 2 - Putin's Russia

Reply #168
The US thinks it has a right to control the world have military everywhere followed by corporate money people and some God-given right.

What you're conventionally forgetting is the US had to keep troops in Europe after the USSR seized control of the eastern half of the continent and that it's Russia now expanding it's military around the world, rigging the election in Crimea. Give your side 97 of the vote? What is this,  Amateur Hour?* At least the smarter folks in the Kremlin had to know that Americans would know that was bullshit, but equally aware that Obama wouldn't start WWIII over Crimea. Try to tell the world they don't have troops in Ukraine when they painted white circles on their vehicles and have soldiers admitting to being Russian troops? AND the Ukrainians fucking captured paratroopers :faint: It would have smarter to admit to having troops there and cite concerns for ethnic Russians.)

* If Mayor Goodman wanted to rig the election for her office, knowing that everybody's aware she has plenty of opposition, as a professional she would give her 53 percent so her victory would be within the margin of error of the opinion polls. They should have come Vegas and hire one of our vote rigging teams. We know how to do it right. :yes: Maybe the side to join Russia would have won anyway, just like Nixon probably would have in 1972. If that's case, just run the election clean instead being an idiot.

Re: Putin the Magnificent: Series 2 - Putin's Russia

Reply #169
Anyway, Howie, no answer for the fact that Putin's enemies tend to find themselves "in a better place?" It's well documented and easily verifiable. More amateur hour, murder Nemtsov in a car owned by a state enterprise? Next time, they should steal some poor schmuck's car and do it and frame him. What a bunch of putzs using primitive Stalin/Cold War era techniques to eliminate opponents. I should mail the Kremlin copies of The Art of War and The Prince to get them started and thinking how to murder more professionally and better. At least the world would have more interesting Whodunit? next time.

Your turn Howie, Krake. Give us an intelligent case that the Kremlin didn't order the execution. Keep in mind none of this necessarily means Putin himself gave the order. I read an argument that Putin isn't this stupid, and that may well be the case. However, also keep in mind that the choice of car indicates an amatateur, perhaps a gifted one in the art of efficiently murdering without leaving survivable wounds; but not-quite-professionals forget things such as having zero clues to bring the Kremlin under suspicion. What were Nemtosv's hobbies and could he have an "accident" while indulging in them. Of course, the geniuses that killed him probably would have used a state car to drive to the scene of his "accident" :faint: Likewise if they wanted to stage a fatal car wreck for him. :p

The Kremlin accuses the opposition of Nemtsov's death, saying it's a "provocation." I don't think there's a argument along those lines that can withstand scrutiny, unless security is so poor that one can walk in, steal a state owned car, drive it to Red Square to commit murder without being stopped.  If that's the case, I should learn enough Russia to be passable and take a job as a janitor in the Kremlin but really conduct espionage. With security so poor, I could probably just copy files onto a thumbdrive from the computers running XP and sell them to CIA and make millions. :p  But I really don't think security is poor enough for me steal topsecret files onto a drive a I can stick in my pocket, let alone a murder car.


Re: Putin the Magnificent: Series 2 - Putin's Russia

Reply #171

What you're conventionally forgetting is the US had to keep troops in Europe after the USSR seized control of the eastern half of the continent and that it's Russia now expanding it's military around the world, rigging the election in Crimea.


The US had to keep troops in Europe? Why? Because it was asked to do so? Out of American generosity?
Don't expect that the world looks through the same white washed US made glasses, you do.

Firstly, military bases built up in countries who have lost the war, like Germany, Italy or Japan have been imposed. Nobody asked for them. Some of the treaties made after capitulation are still valid and kept classified. No government of those countries dares to disolve them unilaterally.
After 70 years those countries are still hosting US military bases. Ask the people living in those countries if they feel more protected because of those bases or rather want them going to hell. What do you thing US nukes are stationed for in Germany? To save my ass or yours in the extreme?

Since WWII the USA  has stretched its military bases all over the world. Guess why? To protect the world from 'Putin's' Russia?

Cold War, War on Drugs, War on Terror. The USA needs those wars like a junky to keep and extend permanently its military bases worldwide. If neccessary it has to project those wars.

"You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time."

Re: Putin the Magnificent: Series 2 - Putin's Russia

Reply #172
Eh Sanguinemoon? Now it is Russia spreading around the world? How utterly daft is that and beyond sense. Now come on now list all the bases that Russia has "all over the world." Hw do you explain the need for your country to have hundreds of bases everywhere?  You controlled dictatorships all over South America for decades so hardly one to put everything even on to the USSR which i had no time for. And anyway when the USSR collapsed what then happened to eastern europe they all moved into the Western camp! So NATO that situation having been corrected should have shut down but no, the imperialism of DC was determined to be the world controller.

Keeping NATO is morally wrong and it is all about military control and corporate greed and how stupid is it to increase the trillions of debt you are in and worsened by military games. On Saturday night I watched the general in charge of the Ukrainian Army in dress uniform saying to a tv cvamera that there were no thousands of Russian troops nor hundreds of tanks in his territory yet your UN ambassador and Deputy Secretary of States both came out with guff and contradicted that military chief! America is such a control and emotion freak that just believes everything the media blasts them with and I bet you very few seen that general or know the truth.

Saying Crimea was a fix is typical. If you support a referendum anywhere then that is morally right but if you don't it is automatically wrong. The only country which is all over the world is yours and in decade after decade every country you have sent the boots in or destabilised has been followed by the corporates. So when you talk about "defending American interests"  what it really means is the money barons money. Our media is bad enough on Russia but your is so out of kilter and dishes out rubbish organised by brain dumbing liars. Crimea never wanted to be part of Ukraine and glad they are back home and what you lot should do is withdraw from this nonsense that the world needs you. no it does not and as i point out any country that you cannot control is automatically an enemy and to be dealt with but this time you are not going to get that so tough.

For a country likes yours with a long history of corruption in politics and money, deep racists problems, militarised police especially on the less fortunate and for heaven's sake don't be black, coming out with utter damnable lies you think the world is as daft as you lot just accepting what the media bangs you with.Try sorting out your own country and accept the fact you are NOT going to dominate Russia so live with it.
"Quit you like men:be strong"

Re: Putin the Magnificent: Series 2 - Putin's Russia

Reply #173
The US had to keep troops in Europe? Why? Because it was asked to do so? Out of American generosity?

Because the Soviet  Union took Eastern Europe and established puppet governments in the region. Geez and they say Americans are bad at history. :faint: The Soviets were afraid Germany would rise again and wanted buffer states
No government of those countries dares to disolve them unilaterally.

How many actually want to?
Cold War, War on Drugs, War on Terror. The USA needs those wars like a junky to keep and extend permanently its military bases worldwide.

I call the War on Terror "the War in Error." You go to war against specific countries and groups, both something like "the War on Terror" sounds like the type of perpetual war in 1984. You always needs something to be a war against, and the war constant against the barbarians the brought down the Romans. The "war on drugs" is also idiocy. However, the Cold War was not unilaterally conducted by the United States. I personally denounced some of the governments the Americans propped up, but look at the crap the Soviet Union pulled. Many of hailed the end of it when the USSR fell, wanting a "peace dividend" in the form of lower taxes, improved education, infrastructure improvements, etc in the hope we could finally reduce the military after decades of pouring money down the pentagon-shaped money-sucking blackhole. But now we have Putin upgrading the Russian military, seizing control of Crimea, fighting along side separatists in Ukraine :( If you know nothing else about Obama, know he is not a cold warrior. He has ideas to improve America (education, equality for LGBT people, spend less a proportion of GDP on the military, etc.) If one agrees with what he wants to do or not, it's clear what Russia's doing now is the last thing he wanted.

Re: Putin the Magnificent: Series 2 - Putin's Russia

Reply #174
Saying Crimea was a fix is typical. If you support a referendum anywhere then that is morally right but if you don't it is automatically wrong.

show me any election or referendum that 97 percent of voters agree on something and I'll show you amateurishly conducted electoral fraud. Try it yourself. Think of a question that most people will say "yes" to and ask 100 truly random people and not just your friends. I guarantee more than three will say "no." You might get 70 or 80 "yes" answers, but not 97.  There hasn't been an honest election in history that's this close to unanimous. Do you get it yet? The problem isn't that the result was "yes" but the "yes" to "no" ratio, especially in region where you have a sizable minority (the Tartars) that are diametrically opposed to Russian rule.