Firstly, :cheers: to all!
I need to learn conversational German before September arrives. I am all too well aware of Rosetta Stone, but I am unable to justify spending $300-400 on it's equipment. Anyone know of any decent language resources that might be available, or indeed, that anyone on here can vouch for personally? Free would be nice, but I am willing to go up to about $35 or so, if need be.
I have downloaded Duolingo and Mindsumo on my IPad, but don't know much about them, other than they are free. I'll be trying them shortly.
Thanks to all, and hope you all have an excellent year!
There's http://livemocha.com/ which might be worth giving a go.
You could also try to see if something out of copyright appeals. A quick search gave https://archive.org/details/exercisesinconv00schrgoog (although that's to assist teachers)
There's also open textbooks.
Community: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/German
Professional: https://courses.dcs.wisc.edu/wp/readinggerman/
Goethe Institute (https://www.goethe.de/en/spr/ueb.html) might be helpful.
Also there are a big number of resources around. YouTube has plenty, the challenge is to pick out the good from the dross. Sweden doesn't have a British Council or Goethe institute, so as an immigrant to Sweden I got an "official" list of Swedish language resources, which included random acts of YouTube.
Rosetta-LiveMocha use the one size fits all-approach. All languages use the same structure as if they were the same, and that is absolutely not the case. What's hard in Czech is not hard in Standard Chinese and vice versa. On the other hand if you learn many languages it makes learning e.g. Hindi more familiar.
I would also endorse Goethe-Institut, even though I am not directly familiar with them. In the French equivalent Institut français I made some real progress with French against all expectations.
Normally I learn best on my own. This means I am very bad at recommending methods to others, because what works for me works only for me.
This looks pretty decent http://www.learndutch.org
Maybe there's something like that for German too :P
Thank you everyone for your help! I appreciate it! :beer: :cheers:
Heavens above Colonel you are really aiming high learning it by September and you don't even come from Glasgow.
Of course you should also get hold of some German speakers, not too many, not too few, and some German beer, not too many, not too few. That is the beer immersion method.
Of course you should also get hold of some German speakers, not too many, not too few, and some German beer, not too many, not too few. That is the beer immersion method.
Quite liking the sound of this method, especially the latter bit! :cheers:
ETA: No Mr. Howie, not the whole language; that would take years. I just want to be able to communicate basic, conversational German.
An amazing new Russian discovery: Etruscans are Russians (along with the discovery that the whole world was originally Russian). The most convincing argument that makes the case goes as follows:
As for me, the name “Etruscan” (Этрусский) is enough. As with many Russian words, it’s a composite: “Et” (“Эт”) means “this is/these are”, while “ruscan” (“русский”) means, well, “Russian”. You can’t get a clearer message than that!
This is just the tip of the iceberg. The iceberg itself can be found at chronologia.org. They have well-produced documentaries on YT too, but I'm not going to link to them.
Another amazing discovery: According to Johannes Goropius Becanus (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johannes_Goropius_Becanus#Linguistic_theories), his home town dialect was the original language in paradise, because words in it are shorter than in Latin and Hebrew, and a name like Noah obviously comes from Flemish
nood.
but I'm not going to link to them.
You could always use CODE.
http://link I don't want to actually link on account of search engine algorithm stuff
The global historiography simply can not permit the very thought that the Slavs (and, in particular, Russian) were not simply the inhabitants of Pripyat marshes in the early Middle Ages, but the direct co-tribesmen of the ancient tribe of the Etruscans, who lived in Italy in the II millennium BC, whose culture, as is commonly believed, laid the foundation for the Ancient Rome.
Boy, someone's got an inferiority complex. Inventing a direct lineage to Rome is
so a thousand years ago. :P
An amazing new Russian discovery: Etruscans are Russians (along with the discovery that the whole world was originally Russian). The most convincing argument that makes the case goes as follows:
:lol:
That Putin man must think that the world is full of idiots like his compatriots that supports him. And rjhowie.
Nah Belfrager you are one of the real idiots as you just get brained by Western propaganda led by America.
Well that is a sensible strategy of you colonel to get some basics in as part of your plan to enjoy Germany so good for you.
The global historiography simply can not permit the very thought that the Slavs (and, in particular, Russian) were not simply the inhabitants of Pripyat marshes in the early Middle Ages, but the direct co-tribesmen of the ancient tribe of the Etruscans, who lived in Italy in the II millennium BC, whose culture, as is commonly believed, laid the foundation for the Ancient Rome.
Boy, someone's got an inferiority complex. Inventing a direct lineage to Rome is so a thousand years ago. :P
Some wacko tribes in western/central Europe tried that, didn't end well.
Another amazing discovery: According to Johannes Goropius Becanus (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johannes_Goropius_Becanus#Linguistic_theories), his home town dialect was the original language in paradise, because words in it are shorter than in Latin and Hebrew, and a name like Noah obviously comes from Flemish nood.
Obviously the language of paradise was early modern english, as we know from the King James Bible.
A click-and-play IPA sound chart https://legisign.org/tiede/ipachart.html
That's pretty cool. :)
Here is a book on Russian stress patterns (http://inslav.ru/publication/zaliznyak-ot-praslavyanskoy-akcentuacii-k-russkoy-m-1985), how they historically developed and all that stuff. I was reading it in order to finally be able to deduce Russian stress for myself if possible. It's a long and complicated read. Then I found the following lecture, which is basically a summary of the book.
[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_93TmQEZys[/video]
The short answer: Russian stress is random. Nobody can deduce it.
On that topic, here's a list of Dutch digital language resources:
https://www.neerlandistiek.nl/2018/09/de-beste-digitale-taalbronnen/
It pretty much agrees with my own go-to sources. I would quibble that there's no need to limit yourself to the WNT, but the link given there seems to (accidentally?) check all the dictionaries accessible through that particular search interface.
Oh no :(
Finnish radio drops Latin news after 30 years
The last bulletin went out last Friday evening...
The original https://yle.fi/aihe/artikkeli/2019/06/11/ylen-nuntii-latinin-viimeinen-lahetys-kuullaan-14-kesakuuta
It was the only regular Latin news program in the world :rip:
I had no idea that existed. I just listened to an episode.
https://areena.yle.fi/1-50142295?autoplay=true
By calculating how much information every syllable in a language conveys, it’s possible to compare the “efficiency” of different languages. And a study published today in Science Advances found that more efficient languages tend to be spoken more slowly. In other words, no matter how quickly speakers chatter, the rate of information they’re transmitting is roughly the same across languages.
[...]
In the new study, the authors calculated the average information density—that is, bits per syllable—of a set of 17 Eurasian languages and compared it with the average speech rate, in syllables per second, of 10 speakers for each language. They found that the rate of information transferred stayed constant—at about 39.15 bits per second, to be exact.
From the abstract of the study,
We show here, using quantitative methods on a large cross-linguistic corpus of 17 languages, that the coupling between language-level (information per syllable) and speaker-level (speech rate) properties results in languages encoding similar information rates (~39 bits/s) despite wide differences in each property individually: Languages are more similar in information rates than in Shannon information or speech rate. These findings highlight the intimate feedback loops between languages’ structural properties and their speakers’ neurocognition and biology under communicative pressures. Thus, language is the product of a multiscale communicative niche construction process at the intersection of biology, environment, and culture.
Wouldn't it be much easier to study the information rate of texts? Has it been done?
I saw some study about cross-linguistic entropy a few years ago. Iirc Africa and South-East Asia supposedly have low word entropy.
It might be this one from 2017:
The Entropy of Words—Learnability and Expressivity
across More than 1000 Languages
Christian Bentz 1,2, *, Dimitrios Alikaniotis 3 , Michael Cysouw 4 and Ramon Ferrer-i-Cancho 5
I'd have to check search the archives of the main linguistics-related blogs I follow, Language Log and Neerlandistiek. That's where I'm most likely to have seen something like that.
Thanks for that suggestion.
By the way, I disagree with the basic premise of the "efficiency" study that more efficient languages are spoken slower. It so happens that Finnish is both more redundant than Estonian (it is basically Estonian with more vowels added, plus vowel harmony) and also slower at the same time. It is to do with syllable structure:
Compared to Finnish, Estonian has dropped vowels wherever feasible, and there is no vowel length distinction in unstressed vowels, which makes for a highly rational syllable structure and easier pronounceability, resulting in a faster-spoken language, perhaps also more "efficient" in information density in quantitative terms. Wouldn't there be something similar when comparing Dutch and German?
If so I'd think it fairly negligible or perhaps in line with the claims of the study. (German being potentially slightly denser and slightly slower.)
FWIW, I’ve still yet to have time to thoroughly study either French or German as I’d intended. Work is having me do a lot of hours. Has been for 3 years now.
Comme on dit en français, c'est la vie. :)
Duolingo is quite OK. It got that needed interactivity fine. It is not sufficient, mind you, but a reasonably fine way to do that necessary practice.
Quite OK seems a bit of an overstatement even if it's praise adjacent at most. I went through their French thing a bit a few years back and a lot of the pronunciations were just plain wrong. But the general principle is useful for some of the basics at least.
The pronunciations being computer-generated and wrong may not be the biggest issue if you could just turn off the sound, but there are literally speaking exercises where you should repeat the sample…
Computer-generated pronunciations? Eww.. I can recommend Speakly. I updated (or kind of upheld rather) my French there when they had a free campaign for a while. No computer-generated nonsense. No real-life interaction either, but if you just want some conversation phrases in writing read out to you so you can repeat, it's fine.
The best conversation exercise is still live interaction. This cannot be changed. Find a real-life friend among native speakers, if you are really serious. (I am not that serious.)
I don't consider computer-speak to be a major issue (though sometimes it is grating). To get proper pronunciation you need more focused work anyway.
The biggest problem is the one language-fits-all approach. Each language is different, and you need to learn the specifics of that language, from a teacher who not only knows the language, but how learners learn it.
But most of language learning is chore, and DuoLingo does that chore well. Use specialised resources to get the rest.
Computer speak is fine; wrong is not.
https://forum.duolingo.com/comment/27284269/Lots-of-mistake-in-French-and-wrong-female-voice-can-we-contribute-ourself
An Estonian dude tried to learn Japanese. Not too bad, I'd say. Literacy in Japanese and Chinese are lifetime projects even for the natives.
[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVAcg1FuyOY[/video]