Re: Anthropogenic Global Warming
Reply #332 –
I was quoting someone. Sober up.
While it's true I missed the exchange you refer to (the topic, as it appeared in my browser, had split to a new page and I failed return to the previous one), one needn't be sober to note your obtuseness… Quoting someone usually involves naming them and using their words.
(And Macallan seems a little foggy on the meaning of "imply"…)
mjm might have said, somewhere, that climate change "is false", as in "catastrophic climate change as a result of human activity is a false conclusion". But your frequent puppetry is unbecoming, ersi.
It's like the hydrologic cycle extended to space. Everybody knows it, only Oakdale's textbooks somehow don't have it.
Yes, ersi, everyone's basic texts us similar graphics to depict the greenhouse effect. But you surely know that such is a gross simplification: The devil's in the details!
Attempting to draw discrete conclusions from a closed dotted line (with arrows!) on a graphic is a pastime appropriate for children. For adults concerned with climatology, and science in general, finer detail is required.
And the details I'm familiar with don't add up to a catastrophic climate change…