Re: The American 2016 Presidential Elections & The Ongoing American Saga
Reply #761 –
That's why a principled, consistent conservative constitutionalist is needed in the presidency.
But your Republicans are none of those things. Their constitutional principles go right out the window, except for perhaps the Second Amendment. They're unprincipled reactionaries appealing to the lowest common denominator and fail to address the real problems of poverty, substandard healthcare that requires ER visits at the taxpayers' expense instead of a routine doctor's office visit, etc. Is Flint really the only city with third-worldish water "issues" thanks to GOP cost cutting measures. The GOP seems too concerned that a Christian baker somewhere might have to bake a cake for a same-sex couple (although one admitted to baking a cake for an adulterous marriage ) and inventing other threats to "religious liberty" than addressing the real challenges our country faces.
But once again, we have poor choices for president. There's the loud mouth Trump, who promises idiotic things such a wall between the US and Mexico. He also admitted to trolling when things got dull, so we don't actually know where he stands on much and how much of what he says he means. I also heard a theory that he'll get his ass handed to him on Super Tuesday but I guess we'll see - South Carolina is hardly representative of mainstream America. Sanders does mean what he says, but his proposals stand a snowball's chance in hell of making it through congress. Cruz is another GOPer that will try to force his brand of Christianity down the country's throat and evidently doesn't know the constitution doesn't allow this and neither do his supporters. Hillary is another neocon on foreign policy and basically a 1990's - early 2000's Republican except for her support of LGBT issues. Rubio is just another bland establishment Republican. So once again, we're left with a choice of the lesser of two evils.