Re: Philosophy, Logic, Formal Systems
Reply #121 –
Seriously, as long asyou don't have any facts to point out, you simply have no case.
Ooh! Bad Eliza… (Isn't this where we stopped talking, the last time?)
BTW: The radio is playing the Dolly Suite, piano four-hands! (Too slow to be the Kliens — but still good…)
—————————————————
(I agree, I've likely let this go too long… But anywho ):Intuition it's always linked to being right. If not, it's not intuition but a mere "guess". Intuition's nature it's a tricky thing and many times intuition it's not even intuition at all.
I believe intuition to be the mind equivalent to the theory of Chaos, an hidden order inside an apparent disorder in what refers to reasoning. It happens to be like that but we don't know why.
If (A) intuition is always right and (B) only after the fact can one determine it was right, and hence, an intuition… (C) How is it distinguishable from a "lucky guess"?
ABCs, Belfrager…
Wouldn't it be simpler to recognize lucky guesses (however they're explained…) than to posit intuitions?
There's an inordinate amount of "psychologism" already going 'round! (Of course, you might respond with something like this… )