I have a suspicion that that first box creating a poll is close to MyOpera's "multiple choice", but here it allows you to determine even the number of choices the voters would take. Am I right?
It's stupid because with a single quote even your quoting feature is an overkill - when everybody is capable of typing a couple of tags. The quick quote is useful when someone needs to pick several quotes from - even from several posts and even by different authors if desired.
Frans, would you be going to implement certain 'dialogues'. Like MyOpera posting tools as to input links etc.? Along with a 'quick quote' thingie, it'd make living here sort of cosier:) I understand it may cause some trouble about the site working properly or such, won't it?
O'k, you've convinced me. I won't be going to change my 3.6.x to something "higher" - however I have a couple of 4.0+ installers (and even a 4.0 already installed - but then manually disabled).
Yes, like that. And it seems to me that I did some workout myself on one of those sites to contrive an appearance I'd have liked... All those capital/non-capital letters... Though, there was some stuff, material to compare, I guess. Maybe I'll return to such pondering about when and if I get bored with this current stuff I've set here. For example, I'd like "Dec. 9, 2013; time", or such. Something with which the eye is familiar to discern at once.
Me too! Still, I have a slight suspicion that some such lists don't currently show all the stuff they should. I mean I used some such "new posts" things (especially those from the 'index' page, alonside with the "from the last visit" one): currently they all have one page, seems ok, but then, when check the sections "manually", I find some lower items with "new" flashies... I don't mind it very much currently - mainly because those sinking topics are not of my interest, but - a peculiarity, say...
Frans, why not losing the "0" in most of the appearances? That is: "09 December", "December 09", etc. I was forced to choose the YYYY-MM-DD format for the purpose of not seeing that damn dangling naught. By the way, I've encountered sites where I was able to choose the format in a very wide range - including the separators!:sherlock: It means: I could use "YYYY-MM-DD", "YYYY/MM/DD", and so such...
The very first seems to lead somewhere to the forum itself; among the lowest three the left contains some "validator" and I don't get it, the other two contain the forum's name, so what are they for? Are we able to use this forum by phone or what?
- just now for this thread in the topics list right above (was) About the "votes". I don't get it - since we have a box to check "the users ARE ALLOWED to change their vote". So was the question -- either a bit of redundancy - or a sort of unnecessary ambiguity -
On the topic. I fully understand your feasibilities and all. I was just mentioning that we might be considering doing something about it. That Flikr you mentioned? Ok, let's hear other folks - what they're going to say. If any...
I can't confirm that. The message remains intact in Opera/Presto, Chromium, and Firefox. (As an aside, clearly ODT was a mistake. It's way too bloated.)
I use Chrome. And the site with 150% zoom -- and I set that BEFORE you've adjusted the text range from your side. O'k, we dump odt? And other OO, ok. Now what about RTF? They are obviously plain text and usually not very heavy as well. The thing is I, for one, prefer the format to make my notes and other stuff here offline...
O'k, they look that way... (No "in-page view"? No? Just asking...)
Well (not exactly), what I was trying to note about the attaching in that failed attempt mentioned, is:
what about RTF? No way? And - ods? Just asking...
most of the odts I went through in my files trying to find something to attach here are much more than 10 kB; I mean is that '10kB' just to be a plain text 1 page thing or what? that'll be not at all enough, I guess...
(checked the "list" feature (not numbered))
Besides, while I was typing,
Quote
Warning - while you were typing a new reply has been posted. You may wish to review your post.
What shall I have done? Suppose I wanted to "review"? I didn't find any "review" button. Nor any preview for my currently created post was available! (I always preview my posts.)
O'k, let me test the attaching. By the way, I did try it just now. The story is that when one of the files occurred to be oversized, and I had an"error" page, the "back" button dropped me "to the void": I had the thread page that looked as if my attachment attempt had never existed, and my further "back-buttoning" proved the forum "really had thought" so. Perhaps I should've just right away hit my keyboard "back", but -- are we testing the place or what?
(let it seem as nosedropping) 
