Skip to main content

Poll

Should Ordinary Citizens be allowed to own, carry, & use Firearms to defend their own lives, & the lives of their family & friends?

Absolutely Yes!
I thinks so.
I don't think so.
Definitely No!
My name isn't String, so let me have a icy cold beer so I can ponder the options...
Topic: Gun Control - Should Ordinary Citizens Own, Carry, & Use Firearms? (Read 329626 times)

Re: Gun Control - Should Ordinary Citizens Own, Carry, & Use Firearms?

Reply #1425
The latest rise continues an upward trend seen in firearms offences in the last few years, however, offences are still 31% below a decade ago (in the year ending March 2007; Figure 11)..
(Emphasis mine.)

Of course, when you go from NRA to the source they are quoting, you see that the picture just might be the exact opposite compared to what NRA is telling you. Keep this in mind whenever you quote NRA, SF.

Re: Gun Control - Should Ordinary Citizens Own, Carry, & Use Firearms?

Reply #1426
......It begins to affect others when they over there bear arms, it is a constitutional right to them, and they think nobody else has such right and that any differing viewpoint of this matter is a sign of being a wimp etc. It is a real detriment to communication.

I don't know anyone at all that feels that way.

Personally, I believe, as do most Americans I know or have met, that all men are endowed with certain inalienable rights by their creator.....the giver of all life......

All men have the right to defend their own lives, & the lives of their loved ones, & friends, & no government can supersede or negate that right.

The right to self-defense is an individual right, & no government or person can dictate how one defends their life, nor decide for them what they may chose to use in defending their life.

The only thing close to it being uniquely American is that while it is evident that the US Constitution does not give, or grant the Right to Keep & Bear Arms, or any other rights for that matter, but AFAIK it is the only Constitution that specifically defends & guarantees an individual's right to keep & bear arms, furthermore it expressly forbids all government or agency of government from infringing upon that right.

Now you can argue every aspect of the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. That's your right, but absolutely nothing you say or do will change one particular of that Amendment, how Americans are protected by it, or what Americans can, or  can not do, in regards to the liberties that Amendment guarantees all individual Americans.

Bottom line ersi, I've got my guns, they are all in excellent order, & I am quite proficient in their use. As long as you, or anyone else, avoids entering my home uninvited, you will probably be safe from the mortal harm they are capable of causing when used as intended.

I don't own my guns because I need them. Need, not now or ever, has anything whatsoever to do with me having them. The only limit I have in ownership is the limits I place upon myself, & that is always subject to change....on a whim from within.

I don't own guns for hunting, though I could. I don't own guns for sport, though they could be used that way. I don't own guns specifically or solely for self-defense, but I do know thousands upon thousands who do. I own guns to ensure that no American Government resorts to tyrannical means in dealing with myself, my friends, or my family.

I took a sacred oath, & even though I be retired from service, I will honor this oath until my final moment on this earth.

I swore as follows:


"I, ______ , do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God."
     In times of universal deceit, telling the honest truth is a revolutionary act.

Re: Gun Control - Should Ordinary Citizens Own, Carry, & Use Firearms?

Reply #1427
......It begins to affect others when they over there bear arms, it is a constitutional right to them, and they think nobody else has such right and that any differing viewpoint of this matter is a sign of being a wimp etc. It is a real detriment to communication.

I don't know anyone at all that feels that way.
For tons of very good examples, start reading yourself from the beginning of this thread. But Oakdale's latest comment here also serves some of the good old American gun-rightist attitude.
...you are still likely watching your telly: The BBC wants you to die; you yourself want to, except and unless your "enemies" --people you disagree with-- might demise before you. Then, you could behave like the un-gentleman you are.

What you really object to about the U.S. 2nd Amendment is simple: You're a wimp. You've always been a wimp and a slacker:
You do what you do on-line because that's all that's left to you...

Re: Gun Control - Should Ordinary Citizens Own, Carry, & Use Firearms?

Reply #1428
I do have to say in fairness to sensible Americans that Smiley is not one of that corner at all. Ful of emotional diatribes and out of date stuff. That Constitution should have been changed an awful long time ago when the place was trying to grow up had police an army for defence and so on. Instead we get all this codswallop about swearing to something and totally ignoring the things inbuilt as protection.   On top of the military and police the place has is it over 14 security agencies?? What a damn farce and our resident terror hypocrite proves that label well! Why does a country need over 300 million personal guns on top of the military farce numbers?

My own personal US friends are totally different from this childish, immature and emotional rubbish. When i passed a comment that Smiley's would-be wonderful President did comment on national mental issues that was ignored. There is a national mentality issue that runs into big numbers and the corporate controllers are right in there like the gun manufacturers and so on. Years ago people used to passingly refer to certain countries as 'Banana Republics' while missing out the biggest...... :irked:
"Quit you like men:be strong"

Re: Gun Control - Should Ordinary Citizens Own, Carry, & Use Firearms?

Reply #1429
Guns are important.
Rural southern Europe have a lot of them, regardless any law - no need of constitutions or whatever, and those arms will be crucial in times to come soon.

Anyway civilian populations are totally defenseless against what is being prepared against them. Guns are just a small tactical help for temporary territorial defense.
A matter of attitude.

Re: Gun Control - Should Ordinary Citizens Own, Carry, & Use Firearms?

Reply #1430
Problem inherently is Belfrager that the US of A has a juvenile built-in emotional mindset. It didn't grow up maturely.
"Quit you like men:be strong"

Re: Gun Control - Should Ordinary Citizens Own, Carry, & Use Firearms?

Reply #1431
The problem, RJ, with your argument is that senility doesn't take hold as quickly as you'd like: We won't catch up with your lot any time soon…
But take heart! You'll be gone before your country is, and before mine has to decide if we should save yours again.
进行 ...
"Humor is emotional chaos remembered in tranquility." - James Thurber
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts!" - Richard Feynman
 (iBook G4 - Panther | Mac mini i5 - El Capitan)

Re: Gun Control - Should Ordinary Citizens Own, Carry, & Use Firearms?

Reply #1432
But take heart! You'll be gone before your country is, and before mine has to decide if we should save yours again.
Lately you saved Iraq, you saved Afghanistan, you saved Libya and you are saving Syria.
Is the UK in the pipeline too?   :no:

Re: Gun Control - Should Ordinary Citizens Own, Carry, & Use Firearms?

Reply #1433
You are gradually dropping from "saving" countries poor Oakdale. Mainland China is replacing you all over the world from one end to the other. It is arranging contracts and industry and it is way, way ahead of your declining empire. Your military is having problems with numbers too and you are even stretching previous things that stopped recruits so principles do not count poor man. Millions in jails, people on death row for a decade or more, poor in tens of millions and you are bragging poor man. Just you keep shooting legions to death in the street as you lot like boasting so you are keeping that principle up!  :P
"Quit you like men:be strong"

Re: Gun Control - Should Ordinary Citizens Own, Carry, & Use Firearms?

Reply #1434
Sad for the U.S, but true.

Idiots like Trump think 19th and 20th Century, military and coal energy. We're in the 21st Century. A century of global deals, information, new energy and economics. The future that determines world power will be economic global alliances.

China will make the deals, make the rules of the road while the U.S. draws into its shell of isolation. A world power that does not make, instead irrelevance.

See pictures of China President Xi with Trump. See him smiling. See him happy. The U.S. is now handing world leadership to him on a silver platter. Something they thought would take another 20 years.

And if we should ever get a decent president who tries to reverse what Trump did, good luck. Don't be surprised then when many will say "Why should we make a deal with the U.S.? How can we be guaranteed that the deals will not be dishonored?"

And so we race into irrelevance.

 

Re: Gun Control - Should Ordinary Citizens Own, Carry, & Use Firearms?

Reply #1435
Well I am afraid Jochie YOUR country duly elected him...........
"Quit you like men:be strong"

Re: Gun Control - Should Ordinary Citizens Own, Carry, & Use Firearms?

Reply #1436
Well I am afraid Jochie YOUR country duly elected him...........
The country did.
Not the people, they elected Clinton.
The Electoral College, the vote that counts, elected Trump. Geographic Math from the 18th Century.

The Electoral College was supposed to be composed of upstanding citizens, to be a brake against the election of stupid or horrid.

Not so. Supreme Court Justice Jackson wrote:
"Electors, although often personally eminent, independent, and respectable, official became voluntary party lackeys and intellectual nonentities to who whose memory we might justly paraphrase a tuneful satire:  'They always voted at their Party's call.  And never thought of thinking for themselves at all.'  As an institution the Electoral College suffered atrophy almost indistinguishable from rigor mortis."

Re: Gun Control - Should Ordinary Citizens Own, Carry, & Use Firearms?

Reply #1437
Excuses I am afraid dear man.

The Electoral College (although I think it is daft) IS as much part of the procedure as the voting so you cannot moan about a legality and moan because your candidate lost. Had it been the other way round the same moans would have came up??!Whatever failings he has she has them as well. The woman is aggressive on some world matters and she is not totally innocent on her history, emails and other things. You are very limited over there and if outside of the 2 corporate parties then nothing. If you are with any other party then tough the limited democracy does not go that far.
"Quit you like men:be strong"

Re: Gun Control - Should Ordinary Citizens Own, Carry, & Use Firearms?

Reply #1438
Everyday it passes I feel the need for a gun.
A matter of attitude.

Re: Gun Control - Should Ordinary Citizens Own, Carry, & Use Firearms?

Reply #1439
Well no bother getting anything including machine guns in nutjobland Belfrager and just look at the numbers they shoot to death annually. More and more guns bought as "security" and the death numbers stay high. What a place.
"Quit you like men:be strong"

Re: Gun Control - Should Ordinary Citizens Own, Carry, & Use Firearms?

Reply #1440
Well no bother getting anything including machine guns in nutjobland Belfrager and just look at the numbers they shoot to death annually. More and more guns bought as "security" and the death numbers stay high. What a place.

  Howie......Do the Math!........Yer talkin' out yer bloody ass, as bloody usual......


Americans don't mind living with those odds, they don't like it, but its the "Price of Freedom".....the kind of "Freedom" Americans want......only you, & the "Nanny State's" progressive pablum pukers can't handle it! 

Thank God you & they will never have any say in the matter!!!!!  

America (the American People)will never give in to what you anti-gunners call "common sense gun control", never because it won't ever stop those few bad men from doing very bad things.

Gun control only affects law abiding gun owners, of which 99+% will never use their firearms in the commission of a crime.

Criminals will never obey any gun law.....ever, unless they want to for some reason......they don't fear the law.....& it's been that way since Cain & Able.






     In times of universal deceit, telling the honest truth is a revolutionary act.

Re: Gun Control - Should Ordinary Citizens Own, Carry, & Use Firearms?

Reply #1441
Homicide doesn't mean murder. Lawful homicide (listed as justified) is still homicide. Accidents, except for shooting yourself, are likely still reckless homicide.

More to the point, the calculations don't add up. As the picture says, let's do some math!

33% is indeed 10560, so far so good, although I imagine we know the real (not nicely rounded) total and the real number of homicides for whatever year this applies to, so why one wouldn't just use those instead is beyond me. 80% of 10560 is 8448, but with all the rounding it would be more consistent to call it 8450.

10560−8448 = 2112, not 1712

That's 400 people more than claimed, the blatant obviousness of which is what caused me to write this post in the first place. There's no way to come up with 1712 out of the numbers given.

Taking that incorrect 1712 gives us a lower chance of
1712÷312000000 = 0.000005487

The incorrect 1712 + 960 accidents gives us the proposed chance of
(1712+960)÷312000000 = 0.000008564

Taking our 2112 gives us a lower chance of
2112÷312000000 = 0.000006769

Adding in accidents gives us a higher the correct and slightly higher chance of
(10560−8448+960)÷312000000 = 0.000009846

A quick check suggests the numbers given are at the very least in the right ballpark, gun injuries notwithstanding. The sum of 2014 gun deaths according to the CBC was higher at 33304. The ~70% robbery/homicide + ~10% homicide associated with criminal enterprise also seems to be correct, although the very thought of police not being sufficiently in control that criminals feel safe enough to be doing shootouts is a bit terrifying.

Re: Gun Control - Should Ordinary Citizens Own, Carry, & Use Firearms?

Reply #1442
Dear oh dear, SmileyFaze back campaigning for the gun empire daftness of the planet. Numbers keep going up on buying guns for "safety" so what does that tell you about stupidity. The place is a damn nutjobland when it comes to guns the types got and so on.  Much of the police in cities are dumbells and killers and also add to the silliness.

Using situation from the late 18th and early 19th centuries as a damn right to buy guns of all descriptions. Why did the place not grow up like elsewhere. Its is amongst the most gun mad places across the globe and act like children with a cowboy and Indian attitude. Does everyone else do what America does? Is America an example of such solving a problem?

You can call me all the names you like boy but you lot are gun mad and a nation still with juvenile minds. Having rights to buy guns of every light and heavy type and having police forces - does it solve mass shooting deaths - shootings are as regular at schools as the sun coming out and  that is for all intents and purposes  swung along with. You are childish, immature and a mess land. You should be concentrating on the 40 million plus who are poor on food stamps the 2 million plus in jails the daftness of death sentences lasting a decade and more. The revolution is long gone as is 1813 and you should have learned to try and be progressively adult and leave crime and issues to the police and so on.

Pathetic.
 :down:
"Quit you like men:be strong"

Re: Gun Control - Should Ordinary Citizens Own, Carry, & Use Firearms?

Reply #1443
You should be concentrating on the 40 million plus who are poor on food stamps the 2 million plus in jails the daftness of death sentences lasting a decade and more. The revolution is long gone as is 1813 and you should have learned to try and be progressively adult and leave crime and issues to the police and so on.

The Trump Administration is going to fix the Food Stamp problem.......take away food stamps & give them FOOD, that's right, they won't be able to sell the Food Stamps on the Black Market anymore, they will be just getting food to feed their hungry bodies.

I agree the death sentences taking 10 to 20 years......I say find them guilty, & then execute them immediately out in the court yard.....no appeals, no challenging the verdict....one bullet in the head, one killer dead.....2 million plus in jails.....it should be 4 million....
1.3% ........ breaks my bleeding heart.....execute 500,000 & then the percentage should drop....
     In times of universal deceit, telling the honest truth is a revolutionary act.

Re: Gun Control - Should Ordinary Citizens Own, Carry, & Use Firearms?

Reply #1444
The Trump Administration is going to fix the Food Stamp problem.......take away food stamps & give them FOOD, that's right, they won't be able to sell the Food Stamps on the Black Market anymore, they will be just getting food to feed their hungry bodies.
It could be described so if Trump instituted free soup kitchen like in socialist commie nazi European countries. But this is not what he is doing:

Under Trump’s proposal, rather than getting all of their benefits to spend on groceries, SNAP recipients who receive more than $90 a month in benefits would also get a package of food that includes “shelf-stable” milk, juice, cereals, pasta, peanut butter, canned meat, and canned fruits and vegetables, all “100 percent American-grown and produced.” They’d pay for those boxes with their benefits and get the remaining value on the EBT card, the way the program works now.
Meaning, it would work like business as usual: Everybody pays for their food. There's no "give them food" a la free soup kitchen and free distribution (by municipal authorities, in addition to churches and other charities) the way it is in Europe. Trump takes the food stamps away and gives nothing in return.

Re: Gun Control - Should Ordinary Citizens Own, Carry, & Use Firearms?

Reply #1445
The Trump Administration is going to fix the Food Stamp problem.......take away food stamps & give them FOOD, that's right, they won't be able to sell the Food Stamps on the Black Market anymore, they will be just getting food to feed their hungry bodies.
Here in Belgium food stamps are seen as an utterly absurd American system for the exact opposite reason.

The basic idea of welfare is to give people more (socialist) or less (liberal) enough to make do,[1] but not to nanny them around telling them this is how much you are allowed to spend on food and this is how much you must spend on clothing. You are theoretically allowed, in other words, to wear rags in a dark unheated living space while dining on lobster, though that would be a self-sabotaging and extremely stupid thing to do. It's not a rampant problem, though doubtless there is the occasional idiot for every 10,000 or 100,000 people on welfare who does something along those lines for some period of time.

Since we're technically in the gun control topic, I find the odds of someone spending their benefits in a way I utterly disapprove of several orders of magnitude more acceptable than those of dying by gun or by car. I suspect that in actuality the chance of something like that happening on welfare is quite significantly lower than that of dying by car, but unfortunately I can't quickly find any evidence to prove or disprove that suspicion.

The weird thing is that for all the talk about freedom and personal responsibility, this kind of welfare micro-management seems to be what the American system is all about. If the idea is to teach people how to budget, how are they going to learn if you budget for them?
Even under socialists something like your fridge breaking would be devastating. Under liberals it'd likely do you in, although liberals often lean more toward American-like systems where the poor might get some subsidy to buy a new fridge under the right circumstances. It's even said that in the Netherlands most poverty is simply a case of people not even knowing they can apply for some fringe (fridge? :P) benefit like that.

Re: Gun Control - Should Ordinary Citizens Own, Carry, & Use Firearms?

Reply #1446
The hard and sad fact of life is that there have been 18 school shooting murders since the short start of 2018 and when you add the whole year before and prior to that they run into damn hundreds.  and they are now as regular in he US of A as apple pie or whatever.  President Trump will get nowhere just like Obama, Bush, Clinton and so on.  Trump comes on tv prattling about the safety of school attenders was the priority but the hard truth is that American no matter who in power has no damn chance of doing anything about it. Indeed it is probably the worse of progressive nations with school young shootings. Using the mental side is a head shaking excuse and when you consider the general rate of gun killings in the country which puts it way up high  that is a farce. There is a wide mental issue in the USA but using that is a sidetrack and hiding behind the 2nd Amendment guff. It's world rating in this issue is way up there and all because it hides behind a Constitution from the early days. With a massive military corner and police lot there is no intelligent need to use something doe in the formative years of the place as a right to but guns of all types and a right.

America is away up there top of the league in percentage gun killings (a S. American country is near to them) but the percent I relate too is massive compared to other democracies.  Trump will not solve the problem and why bother voting over there as the gun lobby runs the messed up place.


Massive gun crime and especially school massacres will continue and they run into hundreds. The place will never sadly grow up while guns of all types will continue to rocket and deaths persists as part of the Constitutional right.

ps. On a passing point if I was a betting man I would win in that  the President will not solve the food stamps disaster.
"Quit you like men:be strong"

Re: Gun Control - Should Ordinary Citizens Own, Carry, & Use Firearms?

Reply #1447

Colorado’s rural schools arming themselves against
danger, long response times




Source:      THE DENVER POST     
Quote
Teachers and staff members in at least a dozen of Colorado’s most remote school districts are arming themselves instead of waiting for local law enforcement to rescue them in the face of a Columbine-style attack.

Those districts have employees carry concealed weapons, train like law officers and then be the first line of security should a school or classroom be targeted by assault.

Colorado law prohibits firearms in the classroom but does allow for security personnel to be armed. These smaller districts, fearing their vulnerability because of their far-flung locations, are training and reclassifying some teachers and staff as security personnel and overseeing the safe storage of their weapons.

The districts say they do so because hiring a security guard can cost more than a teacher’s salary. They also are not relying on the local sheriff’s department for help, where it could take a deputy 60 minutes to get to the front door.

“There’s a bunch of us out here in a kind of no-man’s land,” said Rick Mondt, superintendent for the Briggsdale School District in northeast Weld County.

A bill sponsored by Colorado Senate Majority Leader Chris Holbert, a Parker Republican, will allow a county sheriff to provide a handgun-safety training course to any employee of any public school who also possesses a permit to carry a concealed handgun. Under Senate Bill 5, which had its first hearing Tuesday, county sheriffs would consult with school boards to develop a curriculum for the courses.

The bill also says that someone employed by the school district and who carries a valid conceal-carry permit can carry a concealed handgun onto school grounds, if they have received permission from the local school board.

Training courses for teachers and other staff members are minimal in some cases, Holbert said, adding that his bill will establish and bolster training standards for armed school security.

“This is not a gun bill, but a training bill,” Holbert said.

The bill’s hearing drew both pro-gun and anti-gun speakers before passing 3-2 along a party-line vote. The majority Republicans supported the measure, which now moves to the full Senate.

Critics said the bill repeats the dangerous myth that more gun training will turn English teachers and custodians into experts at close-quarter combat.

“I am going to be a kindergarten teacher and I don’t want to worry about a gun in my possession or one of my colleagues having a gun in their possession,” said Carly Dougherty, whose aunt was killed during the assault at Sandy Hook Elementary School in 2012.

But the bill’s proponents said having school staff members take gun training will discourage someone from targeting a classroom.

“My office is always fielding phone calls from schools and teachers who want to know how they can make the next angry, young man rethink his next move,” said Dudley Brown, head of the Rocky Mountain Gun Owners.

The districts with the policies say they are requiring the type of training routinely required of deputies and police officers.

“People think we are just offering up guns for anybody on our staff to use, and that is not the case,” said Randy Underwood, a member of the Hanover School District school board in eastern El Paso County.

Hanover, which boasts an enrollment of 270 students, is now hammering out its policy that security will be provided by staff members with a conceal-carry permit who undergo annual training that meets school insurability standards.

Underwood voices the thoughts of rural school officials who say even the hint that some school personnel are willing to draw weapons to secure the safety of students will make a prospective attacker think twice before acting.


This is just the beginning. "Gun Free Zones" are magnets for deranged criminals wishing to commit heinous crimes without the fear of any armed opposition, because as we know "good guys obey the law", so if it's a "Gun Free Zone" nobody will be carrying firearms...right?

[glow=black,2,300]Well think again asshole!!!!! [/glow]







     In times of universal deceit, telling the honest truth is a revolutionary act.

Re: Gun Control - Should Ordinary Citizens Own, Carry, & Use Firearms?

Reply #1448
Schizophrenia.
A matter of attitude.

Re: Gun Control - Should Ordinary Citizens Own, Carry, & Use Firearms?

Reply #1449
America has a national racial mentality problem. The hard fact that it is the world leader in school executions, police gunning down unarmed people, and doesn't matter a damn who is in power because the gun organisation corrupts the place and the politicians. stuck with 2 corporate parties will not give in on gun laws. it is the worst country in the world for what is going on and no matter how deadly how high statistics are the utterly crazy guff we get is the 2nd Amendment. Millions of nutjobbers over there have heavy weaponry not just handguns so betrays the whole rights nonsense. It is amongst the worst places in the world and it will not change because of the mental midget minds who just accept that 2nd nonsense. Those against the gun lobby have no chance with either Democrats or republicans. Shooting up schools massive numbers of shooting murders will not change because the small minded and immature thinking using the late 18th and early 19th centuries for what goes on is frankly, stupid and make it amongst the worst places to live.

Mass school shootings are as regular as days and weeks as is the mass shoot killings and so on. The right to buy from pistols to heavy military weapons is a national mentality stupidity and among the top most dangerous places in the world.  :irked:
"Quit you like men:be strong"